Citation Intelligence
How has this authority held up?
See how later panels have treated a decision — followed, or distinguished — and the precedent it rests on. Below is a live sample. Look up any authority across the full corpus with UDRP Intelligence.
SampleThis is a sample citation profile. Looking up any decision across the full UDRP corpus is members-only — upgrade to run your own.
Landmarks:
Veuve Clicquot Ponsardin, Maison Fondée en 1772 v. The Polygenix Group Co.
D2000-0163 · Transfer
SampleTransfer
Cited by
1,031
Followed
2
Positive
0
Distinguished
6
Followed / applied by
PIRELLI & C. S.p.A. v. L.S.A. SERVIZI SRLPanel reliance supporting opportunistic bad faith where a trademark was targeted at registration.ARCELORMITTAL v. Yasser ChoudharyCited by the Complainant to support a finding of opportunistic bad faith where a domain is obviously connected with the complainant’s mark.FINMECCANICA - Società per azioni v. yan songCited by the Complainant to support an inference of opportunistic bad faith.Infront Motor Sports S.r.l. v. Transure Enterprise LtdCited by the Complainant in support of opportunistic bad faith where a domain is obviously connected with the trademark owner.DORNA WSBK ORGANIZATION S.R.L. v. paginas acapulcoCited by the Complainant in support of its opportunistic-bad-faith argument.INFRONT MOTOR SPORTS LICENCE S.r.l. v. VICTOR LEECited by the Complainant as authority that registering a well-known mark without plausible explanation may indicate bad faith.ENI S.p.A. v. BIZZINTROCited by the Complainant for opportunistic bad faith.Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG v. Huang ChaoQiongPanel reliance for the inference of opportunistic bad faith from adopting a well-known mark without an apparent connection to it.
Distinguished / criticised by
None on record
Treatment is drawn from the real citation network for research only. Always read the decisions in context. Not legal advice.