Westmore · UDRP Intelligence

Search every UDRP decision. Understand the intelligence behind it.

Search Westmore's UDRP corpus by domain, case number, complainant, respondent, panelist or legal issue. Discover the facts, reasoning, authorities and patterns behind UDRP decisions.

Learn More — Discover Westmore UDRP Intelligence
Searching the corpus and reading decisions is always free. Your 3 complimentary UDRP Intelligence unlocks apply to deeper actions — a domain Intelligence Report or asking Eleanor to explain a case.
Your complimentary searches: 0 of 3 used · 3 remaining
Westmore Professional

Go beyond the free reports.

Eleanor · Independent Review · included with Professional

Before the other side challenges your case, let Eleanor do it first.

UDRP Intelligence · $395/mo

Unlimited Intelligence Reports, professional Matters (5 new per billing period), authorities & precedent research, panel & party intelligence, citation analysis, comparable decisions and deeper Eleanor analysis. Built for lawyers, investors and brokers.

Received a UDRP complaint?

Lost a UDRP but still want the name?

94,169 decisions · showing 20
Briefing100% transfersTop panelist Richard HillMostly FORUMPeak year 2026
Search intelligence UDRP Intelligence
The full picture behind these 94,169 decisions

Unlock the full search intelligence

Outcome split, panelist win-rate patterns, party & counsel dossiers and CSV export across every matching decision.

Unlock — UDRP Intelligence $395/mo
See plans →
Explore this search
Allianz.bet
WIPO · D2018-0892 · 2018-06-13 · Foster, Dennis A.
Transfer
Complainant
Allianz SE
v.
Respondent
Tim Hok
View case report
Moueskimoboots.com +1
WIPO · D2017-0648 · 2017-05-12 · Fong, Karen
Transfer
Complainant
Mou Limited
v.
Respondent
Debra Nelis / Domain Admin,C/O ID#10760, Privacy Protection Service INC d/b/a PrivacyProtect.org luo yuandong, laoyuandong / Xinnet Whois Privacy Pro Service
View case report
Spirivasucks.com
WIPO · D2015-0978 · 2015-08-17 · Harris, Matthew S.
Transfer
Complainant
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG
v.
Respondent
Whoisguard Protected, Whoisguard, Inc. / ESQUIRE 5, J Gates
Nameshield
View case report
Birginone.com +31
WIPO · D2015-0168 · 2015-03-31 · Barker, Sir Ian
Transfer
Complainant
Virgin Enterprises Limited
v.
Respondent
Robert Paulson
View case report
Gta5betacodes.com
WIPO · D2013-0609 · 2013-05-27 · Spence, Michael J.
Transfer
Complainant
Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.
v.
Respondent
Jon Davies
View case report
Savegram.app +1
WIPO · D2026-1954 · 2026-06-29 · Bettinger, Torsten
Transfer
Complainant
Instagram, LLC
v.
Respondent
Le Tong Minh Luong
View case report
Shieldprohomewarranty.com
FORUM · FA2607002232992 · 2026-10-28 · Richard Hill
Transfer
Complainant
NRRM, LLC
v.
Respondent
Tayyab Alam / Rising Tech Solutions LLC
Dickinson Wright PLLC
View case report
Dollypartonhq.shop +1
FORUM · FA2609002246278 · 2026-10-28 · Sandra J. Franklin
Transfer
Complainant
ESTATE OF DOLLY PARTON
v.
Respondent
Colton Sullivan / Uriaselle Baldwin
Buchalter LLP
View case report
Atriumhealth.ai
FORUM · FA2609002246703 · 2026-10-28 · Carol M. Stoner, Esq.
Transfer
Complainant
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority, d/b/a Atrium Health
v.
Respondent
Jason Gerbick
Robinson Bradshaw & Hinson, P.A.
View case report
Creditninija.com
FORUM · FA2609002248125 · 2026-10-28 · Sandra J. Franklin
Transfer
Complainant
Ninja Holdco, LLC
v.
Respondent
Zhichao
Marshall, Gerstein & Borun LLP
View case report
Tartecosmeticsbestsale.com
FORUM · FA2609002248161 · 2026-10-28 · The Honorable Neil Anthony Brown KC
Transfer
Complainant
Tarte, Inc.
v.
Respondent
Westboge
Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck
View case report
Billboardworldmusic.com
FORUM · FA2609002248229 · 2026-10-28 · Alan L. Limbury
Transfer
Complainant
Billboard IP Holdings, LLC
v.
Respondent
Harry Justin
Flaster Greenberg PC
View case report
Ethelcainmerchstore.com
FORUM · FA2609002248371 · 2026-10-28 · Sandra J. Franklin
Transfer
Complainant
Briarpatch, LLC
v.
Respondent
Ruslan Chavez
Blank Rome LLP
View case report
Idexcorpus.com
FORUM · FA2609002248488 · 2026-10-28 · Nicholas J.T. Smith
Transfer
Complainant
IDEX Corporation
v.
Respondent
John McGregor / Log Rocket
Tucker Ellis, LLP
View case report
Jaysonhomes.com
FORUM · FA2610002248647 · 2026-10-28 · James Bridgeman SC
Transfer
Complainant
Artists’ Frame Service, Inc.
v.
Respondent
Tianxiang Wen / WenTianxiang
Aaron Goltz
View case report
Curadcare.com
FORUM · FA2610002248730 · 2026-10-28 · Debrett G. Lyons
Transfer
Complainant
Medline Industries, L.P.
v.
Respondent
Davis Charlotte / CharlotteDavis
Pattishall, McAuliffe, Newbury, Hilliard & Geraldson LLP
View case report
Medlineexpert.com
FORUM · FA2610002248853 · 2026-10-28 · Paul M. DeCicco
Transfer
Complainant
Medline Industries, LP
v.
Respondent
Lenskaya Valeriya Valentinovna / Valeriya Valentinovna Lenskaya
Pattishall, McAuliffe, Newbury, Hilliard & Geraldson LLP
View case report
Ozarksoutdoor.org
FORUM · FA2610002249195 · 2026-10-28 · Alan L. Limbury
Transfer
Complainant
Walmart Apollo, LLC
v.
Respondent
Alex Harrison
Brooks Kushman P.C.
View case report
Thefreeassembly.com
FORUM · FA2610002249209 · 2026-10-28 · Richard Hill
Transfer
Complainant
Walmart Apollo, LLC
v.
Respondent
genteq store
Brooks Kushman P.C.
View case report
Blackstonestrade.asia
FORUM · FA2610002249321 · 2026-10-28 · Richard Hill
Transfer
Complainant
Blackstone TM L.L.C.
v.
Respondent
Gl Mi
Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, P.C.
View case report
Powered by Westmore
UDRP Experts

You don't have to read or learn any of this. Westmore AI does it for you.

Three steps. No 116,119 decisions to read, no stress, no $3,500 lawyer bill.

  1. 1
    Search the claim

    Enter your WIPO, FORUM or CAC case number — or just the domain name. That's all Westmore needs to start.

  2. 2
    Westmore does the work

    It reads the record, sizes up the panel and the other side, and pulls the precedent that wins for your side — everything below, done for you.

  3. 3
    Your case, ready to file

    Westmore hands you a finished, attorney-review-ready complaint or defence. Just download it and submit it yourself — done.

Build my case — $895 One-time, per matter — attorney-review-ready in about 10 minutes.
Build your case

Everything Westmore does for you

One workspace that reads the record, sizes up the panel and the other side, drafts your filing and hands you a clean, attorney-review-ready file — the full toolkit behind UDRP Intelligence and the $895 UDRP Matter.

Built on every WIPO, FORUM + CAC decision — 116,119+ and counting

Read the record

Find the decisions that matter — and the ones that don't hold up.

See Nike's record
  • Decision search — every WIPO, FORUM + CAC case
  • Precedent finder — decisions like yours
  • Full decision-text reader
  • Case intelligence — a source-linked dossier on any decision
  • Case timeline & full ownership history
  • Compare any two decisions side by side
  • Three-element test, lined up decision-to-decision
  • Fact-pattern outcomes — how disputes like yours actually go
  • Per-domain outcomes in multi-domain cases
  • Corpus-cited authorities you can verify
  • Citation-treatment map — is your authority still good law?
  • Well-followed authority ranking
  • Outcome, provider, TLD & year filters

Know the panel & parties

Read the panel and the other side before you ever file.

See a panel sample
  • Panelist Intelligence — transfer vs. denial rates
  • Panelist RDNH & bad-faith history
  • Sole vs. three-member panel tendencies
  • Decision consistency — how predictable a panelist is
  • Compare two panelists side by side
  • Test your facts against a specific panelist
  • Respondent Research — every case a party was named in
  • Complainant Research — track record & win rates
  • Repeat-offender & recurring-registrant detection
  • Counsel & firm league tables
  • Brand Exposure Report — a brand's entire UDRP footprint

Build your filing

Turn the record into a complaint or defence you can file.

See a Cite-Check sample
  • Case theory built from your facts
  • AI-drafted complaint or response
  • Evidence matrix — element-by-element mapping
  • Evidence-gap radar — what your proof is missing
  • Strategy map for your matter
  • Quotation bank — panel language on point
  • RDNH analysis — reverse-hijacking risk read
  • Cite-check — verify authorities before you file
  • Multilingual drafting — any language
  • Response-deadline clock — your 20-day countdown

WHOIS, evidence & export

Lock down the ownership record and walk out with the file.

See a WHOIS sample
  • Full Westmore WHOIS — live ownership & registration record
  • Domain timeline — registration & ownership history
  • Ownership history verified against two independent registration-history sources
  • Trademark signals — mark-vs-domain conflict read
  • 100 searches every month
  • One-page brand & panelist profiles — download or email
  • Word (.docx) export — attorney-review-ready
  • CSV / PDF export
  • Formatted, ready-to-cite references
  • Print-and-file output your counsel can pick up

UDRP explained

What is the UDRP, and how does a domain name dispute work?

What is the UDRP?

The Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy (UDRP) is the ICANN policy that lets a trademark owner challenge a domain name registered and used in bad faith. Adopted in 1999, it applies to every generic top-level domain, including .com, .net and .org, and is binding on every registrant through their registration agreement.

Cases are decided on written submissions by independent panelists appointed by approved providers such as WIPO, the Forum (formerly NAF) and CIIDRC. There is no hearing, and the only remedies are transfer or cancellation of the domain.

The three elements a complainant must prove

To win, the complainant must show that the domain is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark in which it has rights, that the respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the domain, and that the domain was registered and is being used in bad faith.

All three must be proven. Panels deny complaints where the respondent shows a genuine business, a fair use or a registration that predates the trademark, and they can find reverse domain name hijacking where a complaint was brought in bad faith.

How long a UDRP takes and what it costs

A typical case runs about two months from filing to decision. The respondent normally has 20 days to reply after the proceeding commences, and a transfer is implemented 10 business days after the decision unless a court action is filed.

Provider fees depend on the provider, the number of domains and panel size. At WIPO, the base fee for 1 to 5 domains is USD 1,500 with a single panelist. Counsel fees are usually the larger cost.

Search every UDRP decision

Westmore indexes more than 100,000 UDRP decisions across providers. Search by domain, case number, complainant, respondent, panelist, law firm or legal issue, and read a plain-English summary of each outcome alongside the full decision text.

For practitioners, the corpus shows how panels have ruled on comparable facts, which arguments carry weight and how often complaints succeed, so you can assess a case or a defence on evidence rather than instinct.

Frequently asked questions

What does UDRP stand for?+

UDRP stands for the Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy, the ICANN policy for resolving disputes over domain names that allegedly infringe trademark rights. Every registrant of a generic top-level domain agrees to it when they register.

Who decides a UDRP case?+

An independent panel of one or three panelists appointed by an approved provider such as WIPO, the Forum or CIIDRC decides each case on written submissions. Panelists are typically experienced intellectual property lawyers or academics.

Can a UDRP decision be appealed?+

There is no internal appeal. A losing party can file a court action in an appropriate jurisdiction within 10 business days of the decision, which suspends implementation of the transfer while the case proceeds.

What is reverse domain name hijacking?+

Reverse domain name hijacking (RDNH) is a finding that the complainant brought the UDRP in bad faith, for example to pressure a legitimate owner into giving up a domain. It carries no financial penalty but is published in the decision.

Does the UDRP apply to .ca and other country domains?+

The UDRP covers generic top-level domains. Many country-code registries have their own policies; .ca disputes, for example, are handled under CIRA's Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (CDRP), while some ccTLDs have adopted the UDRP directly.

Is it better to file a UDRP or buy the domain?+

If the owner has a plausible legitimate interest, a UDRP risks a denial, a public record and even an RDNH finding. In those cases a confidential acquisition is often faster and more certain. Westmore helps buyers weigh both paths.

UDRP statistics by provider and extension Monthly UDRP data report
The complete guide

UDRP Guide: Domain Name Disputes Explained

UDRP Process Timeline: Complaint to Transfer GuideUDRP Cost: Fees, Counsel and Hidden Costs ExplainedHow to File a UDRP Complaint: Practical StepsUDRP response: what to do in the first 20 daysWIPO vs Forum UDRP vs CIIDRC: How to ChooseUDRP Success Rate: What 100,000+ Decisions ShowUDRP Decisions: How to Search and Read Them WellUDRP vs ACPA Lawsuit: Choosing the Right RouteUDRP vs URS: Key Differences and When to Use EachCIRA Domain Dispute Guide: .ca CDRP in CanadaRights or Legitimate Interests in UDRP ClaimsConfusingly Similar UDRP: How Panels Test Element One

Confidential buyer-side representation for premium-domain acquisitions, backed by WHOIS, UDRP and domain-sales intelligence.

or
Call 1-321-399-1710Text / WhatsApp 1-289-275-1161
Buyer-side only Escrow-protected NDA on request
Services
Research
UDRP
Widgets
Westmore
Support
Know everything about a domain
Owner, history, status and risk in one search

Copyright © 2026 Westmore. All rights reserved.

Start a confidential acquisition →

Essential cookies only. Nothing is sold or shared.