Westmore · UDRP DecisionWwwrueducommerce.com
The Panel ordered transfer of <wwwrueducommerce.com>, finding it confusingly similar to the Complainant’s RUE DU COMMERCE marks, that the Respondent lacked rights or legitimate interests, and that the domain was registered and passively used in bad faith to take advantage of those marks.
The timeline behind wwwrueducommerce.com
Registration, the decision and the archived record of what this domain actually displayed — from public RDAP and the Internet Archive.
Westmore reconstructs the full history behind wwwrueducommerce.com — from public RDAP and the Internet Archive — as part of UDRP Intelligence:
In the absence of a response, the Panel inferred that the Respondent had the Complainant’s trademarks in mind when registering the domain and found that its passive use was intended to take advantage of those marks.
Result of record. The panel's reasoning and decisive facts behind each element are in the Intelligence dossier below.
Case number CAC-UDRP-101028 Time of filing 2015-08-17 10:26:45 Domain names wwwrueducommerce.com Case administrator Name Lada Válková (Case admin) Complainant Organization RUEDUCOMMERCE Complainant representative Organization CHAIN AVOCATS Respondent Name Mrs. Helen COLLINS Other Legal Proceedings The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name. Identification Of Rights The Complainant owns the following registered trademarks: - French trademark with number 3036950 RUE DU COMMERCE, registered on 27 June 2000 for goods and services in classes 9, 16, 28, 35, 38, 41 and 42 - French trademark with number 99805150 RDC.fr Rue du Commerce, registered on 28 July 1999 for goods and services in classes 35, 38 and 42 - French trademark with number 3374566 WWW.RUE DU COMMERCE.COM, registered on 29 July 2005 for goods and services in classes 9, 16, 28, 35, 38, 41 and 42 - Community trademark with number 8299381 RUE DU COMMERCE.COM, registered on 14 May 2009 for goods and services in classes 16, 35, 36, 37, 38, 41 and 42 - Community trademark with number 8299356 RUE DU COMMERCE, registered on 14 May 2009 for goods and services in classes 16, 35, 36, 37, 38, 41 and 42 - Community trademark with number 12014833 RUE DU COMMERCE, registered on 25 July 2013 for goods and services in classes 9, 16, 35, 36, 37, 38, 41 and 42 Factual Background FACTS ASSERTED BY THE COMPLAINANT AND NOT CONTESTED BY THE RESPONDENT Complainant is a French company which was established on 27 April 1999 and operates an internet-order selling business on web sites accessible in particular at the Internet addresses "www.rueducommerce.com" and "www.rueducommerce.fr". The Complainant has been in business for eleven years and its trademarks gained an important notoriety among the French Internet public and consumers. The disputed domain name <wwwrueducommerce.com> was registered on 18 February 2008, and it resolves to a blank website, which offered the disputed domain name for sale until recently. The Complainant unsuccessfully sent complaint letters to the Respondent which were returned as undeliverable. Parties Contentions NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED. Rights The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i)of the Policy). No Rights or Legitimate Interests The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Domain Name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii)of the Policy). Bad Faith The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Domain Name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii)of the Policy). Procedural Factors The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision. Principal Reasons for the Decision 1. The disputed domain name includes the entire well-known RUE DU ECOMMERCE and WWW.RUE DU COMMERCE.COM trademarks of the Complainant, with the addition of only "www" and the deletion of the dot after "www", respectively, which do not take away the similarity between the Complainant's trademarks and the disputed domain name. The Panel therefore finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant's RUE DU COMMERCE and WWW.RUE DU COMMERCE. COM trademarks. 2. The Panel finds the Complainant has established that the Respondent was not licensed or authorized to use the Complainant's trademark in the disputed domain name. Furthermore, the Panel finds the Complainant successfully submitted prima facie evidence that the Respondent has made no use of, or demonstrable preparations to use, the disputed domain name in connection with a bona fide offering of goods or services, nor is making a legitimate non-commercial or fair use of the disputed domain name, nor is commonly known under the disputed domain name. The Panel therefore finds the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Domain Name. 3. In the absence of a Response, the Panel infers that the Respondent had the Complainant's RUE DU COMMERCE and WWW.RUE DU COMMERCE. COM trademarks in mind when registering the disputed domain name, which was therefore registered and is being (passively) used in bad faith, in order to take advantage of the Complainant's trademarks. For all the reasons stated above, the Complaint is Accepted and the disputed domain name(s) is (are) to be WWWRUEDUCOMMERCE.COM: Transferred PANELLISTS Name Alfred Meijboom Date of Panel Decision 2015-09-22 Publish the Decision
Source of record: CAC . Reproduced for research; CAC is the authoritative source.
What Westmore sees around wwwrueducommerce.com
The decision is only the record. Westmore connects it to the cases, authorities, panelists, parties and domain evidence surrounding it.

A short, grounded explanation drawn only from this decision's record — not legal advice or a prediction.
Grounded in the Westmore record for this decision. Research/informational only — not legal advice or a prediction of any outcome.
The decision is only the beginning.
You've seen what happened. Now discover the deeper intelligence behind the case, the panelist, the parties and the authorities that matter.
Go beyond the public record: see how this case has been cited, find comparable decisions, analyze the panelist and apply the relevant authorities to your Matter.
Westmore Professional · $395/month
Research with UDRP IntelligenceWestmore AI drafts an attorney-review-ready UDRP response from your facts, grounded in the exact panel and closest precedent.
$895 one-time per matter · no subscription required. Self-help drafting aid — not legal advice.
Build your responseWestmore UDRP records draw on CAC-indexed decisions and are provided for research and informational purposes only. Not legal advice, a clearance opinion, or a prediction of any outcome.