Westmore · UDRP decision
CAC · Case No. CAC-UDRP-104162

Tenders-hitachi.com

TransferCAC-indexed · informational, not legal advice

The Panel ordered transfer of tenders-hitachi.com after finding it confusingly similar to the Complainant's HITACHI mark, that the Respondent lacked rights or legitimate interests, and that the domain was registered and used in bad faith through deceptive emails falsely purporting to originate from the Complainant's subsidiary as part of an inferred fraudulent scheme.

Outcome
Transfer
At a glance
Provider
CAC
Outcome
Transfer
Decision date
2021-12-30
Panelist(s)
Jonathan Turner
Complainant
Hitachi, Ltd.
Respondent
SMENS GMBH
Law firm
RODENBAUGH LAW
Disputed domain(s)
tenders-hitachi.com
Domain history UDRP Intelligence

The timeline behind tenders-hitachi.com

Registration, the decision and the archived record of what this domain actually displayed — from public RDAP and the Internet Archive.

Westmore reconstructs the full history behind tenders-hitachi.com — from public RDAP and the Internet Archive — as part of UDRP Intelligence:

Registration → decision → today timeline
Archived Wayback evidence of what the site showed
Registry bad-faith signals
The live current registrant
Available in UDRP Intelligence
Verified public record
Outcome & remedy
Complaint granted. Panel ordered transfer of tenders-hitachi.com.
Reverse Domain Name Hijacking
No RDNH raised.
Westmore Insight

The Panel found the emails clearly deceptive and inferred that they formed part of a fraudulent scheme. It further inferred that the domain was registered for that purpose, establishing both bad-faith registration and use.

The three-part test
Identical or confusingly similarMet
Rights or legitimate interestsMet
Registered and used in bad faithMet

Result of record. The panel's reasoning and decisive facts behind each element are in the Intelligence dossier below.

Case details
Provider
CAC
Outcome
Transfer
Decision date
2021-12-30
Panel
Jonathan Turner
Full decision
4 min read · hosted by Westmore

Case number CAC-UDRP-104162 Time of filing 2021-11-18 09:41:34 Domain names tenders-hitachi.com Case administrator Organization Iveta Špiclová (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin) Complainant Organization Hitachi, Ltd. Complainant representative Organization RODENBAUGH LAW Respondent Organization SMENS GMBH Other Legal Proceedings The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name. Identification Of Rights The Complainant relied on the following registrations of the mark HITACHI of which it is the registered proprietor: - US trademark no. 0701266 registered on 19 July 1960; - Japanese trademark no. H1492488 registered on 25 December 1981; - EU registered trademark no. 000208645 registered on 21 December 1999; - EU registered trademark no. 001070192 registered on 10 September 2000; - EU registered trademark no. 002364313 registered on 27 November 2002; - EU registered trademark no. 002809903 registered on 3 October 2003; - UK registered trademark no. 00000811836 registered on 11 October 1960. Factual Background The Complainant and its subsidiaries constitute a large multinational group employing 300,000 people. The group designs, manufactures and sells a variety of products under its principal mark HITACHI. The Complainant has registered this mark in Japan, USA and the EU as stated above. The Complainant's subsidiaries include Hitachi High-Tech Europe GmbH.The Complainant completed a public tender offer for the shares of this company in 2020. The Respondent registered the disputed domain name on 3 April 2021. The Respondent has sent e-mails using e-mail addresses comprising the disputed domain name and purporting to be from Hitachi High-Tech Europe GmbH, inviting the recipient to prepare and submit an unspecified offer. Parties Contentions No administratively compliant Response has been filed. Rights It is clear that the Complainant has registered rights in the mark HITACHI. The disputed domain name comprises the whole of this mark preceded by the descriptive term "tenders". Internet users would naturally assume that the domain name is used by a company in the Hitachi group to refer to tenders of some form. The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy. No Rights or Legitimate Interests The Panel accepts the undisputed evidence of the Complainant that the Respondent has not used the disputed domain name or a corresponding name for any bona fide offering of goods or services or for any legitimate non-commercial or fair use, and that the Respondent is not commonly known by any such name and has not been authorised by the Complainant to use any such name. The disputed domain name does not locate any website and the only use made of the disputed domain name by the Respondent appears to have been as an e-mail address for deceptive e-mails falsely purporting to be from the Complainant's subsidiary, Hitachi High-Tech Europe GmbH. The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy). Bad Faith The emails sent by the Respondent using the disputed domain name and purporting to be from Hitachi High-Tech Europe GmbH, inviting the recipient to prepare and submit an offer, are clearly deceptive, and the Panel infers that they are part of a fraudulent scheme. The Panel also infers that the disputed domain name was registered for this purpose. In these circumstances, the Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown that the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy). Procedural Factors The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision. Principal Reasons for the Decision The disputed domain name consists of the principal mark of the Complainant's multinational group together with a descriptive term. The Complainant is the proprietor of longstanding registrations of the mark in Japan, USA, the EU and the UK. The disputed domain name was registered very recently. The only use of the disputed domain name has been as an email address in e-mails falsely purporting to be from the Complainant's subsidiary Hitachi High-Tech Europe GmbH, apparently as part of a fraudulent scheme. The Panel finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant's registered mark, the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interest in it, and it was registered and is being used in bad faith. For all the reasons stated above, the Complaint is Accepted and the disputed domain name(s) is (are) to be TENDERS-HITACHI.COM: Transferred PANELLISTS Name Jonathan Turner Date of Panel Decision 2021-12-30 Publish the Decision

Source of record: CAC . Reproduced for research; CAC is the authoritative source.

Beyond the decision

What Westmore sees around tenders-hitachi.com

The decision is only the record. Westmore connects it to the cases, authorities, panelists, parties and domain evidence surrounding it.

Connected to Westmore UDRP Intelligence
116,088 decisions · citations · panelists · parties · domain history
Eleanor · UDRP intelligence
Ask Eleanor about this decision
Ask Eleanor about this decision

A short, grounded explanation drawn only from this decision's record — not legal advice or a prediction.

Unlocking Eleanor for this case uses 1 of your complimentary Intelligence unlocks· 3 remaining

Grounded in the Westmore record for this decision. Research/informational only — not legal advice or a prediction of any outcome.

Westmore Professional · Unlock the intelligence

The decision is only the beginning.

You've seen what happened. Now discover the deeper intelligence behind the case, the panelist, the parties and the authorities that matter.

Citation Intelligence
How this decision is cited and treated across the corpus.
Panelist Intelligence
The panel's tendencies, outcomes and reasoning patterns.
Domain History
Ownership chronology — creation vs. respondent acquisition.
Opposing-Party Research
Complainant, counsel and portfolio context.
Independent Case Review
Eleanor challenges your filing before the other side does.
Professional Matters
Open, research and manage matters end to end.
$395/month
Unlock Westmore Professional Annual & firm seats available · cancel anytime
Take the next step
Westmore UDRP · find the right service

Westmore UDRP records draw on CAC-indexed decisions and are provided for research and informational purposes only. Not legal advice, a clearance opinion, or a prediction of any outcome.

Confidential buyer-side representation for premium-domain acquisitions, backed by WHOIS, UDRP and domain-sales intelligence.

or
Buyer-side only Escrow-protected NDA on request
Services
Research
UDRP
Widgets
Westmore
Support
Know everything about a domain
Owner, history, status and risk in one search

Copyright © 2026 Westmore. All rights reserved.

Start a confidential acquisition →

Essential cookies only. Nothing is sold or shared.