Westmore · UDRP decision
WIPO · Case No. D2000-1150

Fadals.com + 11 more domains

Complaint denied, transfer in partWIPO-indexed · informational, not legal advice

The published case metadata records a split outcome described as “Complaint denied, transfer in part” concerning 12 domain names. Because no decision text was supplied and the source record marks the decision as not published, the domains ordered transferred, the domains for which the Complaint was denied, and the Panel’s reasoning cannot be identified from this record.

Outcome
Denied
At a glance
Provider
WIPO
Outcome
Complaint denied, transfer in part
Decision date
2001-03-14
Panelist(s)
Dabney, James W. · Lisman, Natasha (Presiding) · Weinstein, Jordan S.
Complainant
Giddings & Lewis, L.L.C.
Respondent
Neal McKean a/k/a Machineworks Inc. a/k/a IMachineTools.com
Disputed domain(s)
fadals.com, fadalsused.com, fadal-used.com, fadalused.com + 8 more
Citation weightCited by 1 later decision
Domain history UDRP Intelligence

The timeline behind fadals.com

Registration, the decision and the archived record of what this domain actually displayed — from public RDAP and the Internet Archive.

Westmore reconstructs the full history behind fadals.com — from public RDAP and the Internet Archive — as part of UDRP Intelligence:

Registration → decision → today timeline
Archived Wayback evidence of what the site showed
Registry bad-faith signals
The live current registrant
Available in UDRP Intelligence
Outcome by domain

How each disputed name was decided in this proceeding.

fadals.comUndetermined
fadalsused.comUndetermined
fadal-used.comUndetermined
fadalused.comUndetermined
usedfadalcnc.comUndetermined
used-fadal.comUndetermined
usedfadal.comUndetermined
usedfadal.netUndetermined
Verified public record
Outcome & remedy
Complaint granted. Panel ordered transfer of fadals.com.
Reverse Domain Name Hijacking
No RDNH raised.
Westmore Insight

The case is notable in the supplied metadata as a multi-domain proceeding with a split disposition. Its research value is limited without the published decision because neither the domain-by-domain outcome nor the reasoning under the three UDRP elements can be established.

The three-part test
Identical or confusingly similarunclear
Rights or legitimate interestsunclear
Registered and used in bad faithunclear

Result of record. The panel's reasoning and decisive facts behind each element are in the Intelligence dossier below.

Case details
Provider
WIPO
Outcome
Complaint denied, transfer in part
Decision date
2001-03-14
Panel
Dabney, James W. · Lisman, Natasha (Presiding) · Weinstein, Jordan S.
Full decision

Full decision text is not available in Westmore's current record. The decision below is summarized from the verified public record; you can read the complete decision at the authoritative source.

View original source at WIPO
Beyond the decision

What Westmore sees around fadals.com

The decision is only the record. Westmore connects it to the cases, authorities, panelists, parties and domain evidence surrounding it.

Connected to Westmore UDRP Intelligence
115,871 decisions · citations · panelists · parties · domain history
Eleanor · UDRP intelligence
Ask Eleanor about this decision
Ask Eleanor about this decision

A short, grounded explanation drawn only from this decision's record — not legal advice or a prediction.

Unlocking Eleanor for this case uses 1 of your complimentary Intelligence unlocks· 3 remaining

Grounded in the Westmore record for this decision. Research/informational only — not legal advice or a prediction of any outcome.

Westmore Professional · Unlock the intelligence

The decision is only the beginning.

You've seen what happened. Now discover the deeper intelligence behind the case, the panelist, the parties and the authorities that matter.

Citation Intelligence
How this decision is cited and treated across the corpus.
Panelist Intelligence
The panel's tendencies, outcomes and reasoning patterns.
Domain History
Ownership chronology — creation vs. respondent acquisition.
Opposing-Party Research
Complainant, counsel and portfolio context.
Independent Case Review
Eleanor challenges your filing before the other side does.
Professional Matters
Open, research and manage matters end to end.
$395/month
Unlock Westmore Professional Annual & firm seats available · cancel anytime
Take the next step
Westmore UDRP · find the right service

Westmore UDRP records draw on WIPO-indexed decisions and are provided for research and informational purposes only. Not legal advice, a clearance opinion, or a prediction of any outcome.

Confidential buyer-side representation for premium-domain acquisitions.

LinkedIn
Insights
Briefs
Who Owns
Westmore
Research
UDRP
Support
Buyer-side only· Escrow-protected· NDA on request

© 2026 Westmore. All rights reserved.

A note on privacy

Westmore uses a few essential cookies to keep this site secure and running smoothly. Nothing about your identity or interest is ever sold or shared.