Westmore · UDRP decision
WIPO · Case No. D2000-1553

Antiflirt.net

Complaint deniedWIPO-indexed · informational, not legal advice

The complaint concerning antiflirt.net was denied. The supplied WIPO case metadata identifies Angelica Lodigiani as panelist, but the decision text is not published, so the panel's reasoning and findings on the individual UDRP elements are unavailable.

Outcome
Denied
At a glance
Provider
WIPO
Outcome
Complaint denied
Decision date
2001-03-13
Panelist(s)
Lodigiani, Angelica
Complainant
Anti Flirt S.A. Jacques Amsellem
Respondent
WCVC
Disputed domain(s)
antiflirt.net
Citation weightCited by 8 later decisions
Domain history UDRP Intelligence

The timeline behind antiflirt.net

Registration, the decision and the archived record of what this domain actually displayed — from public RDAP and the Internet Archive.

Reconstructing the record for antiflirt.net…
Verified public record
Outcome & remedy
Complaint denied. antiflirt.net remained with the respondent.
Reverse Domain Name Hijacking
No RDNH raised.
Westmore Insight

The record confirms a denied complaint involving antiflirt.net but does not reveal which UDRP element failed or why. It is therefore useful primarily as outcome and case-identity metadata, not as substantive precedent or a source of fact-pattern reasoning.

The three-part test
Identical or confusingly similarunclear
Rights or legitimate interestsunclear
Registration and use in bad faithunclear

Result of record. The panel's reasoning and decisive facts behind each element are in the Intelligence dossier below.

Case details
Provider
WIPO
Outcome
Complaint denied
Decision date
2001-03-13
Panel
Lodigiani, Angelica
Full decision

Full decision text is not available in Westmore's current record. The decision below is summarized from the verified public record; you can read the complete decision at the authoritative source.

View original source at WIPO
Beyond the decision

What Westmore sees around antiflirt.net

The decision is only the record. Westmore connects it to the cases, authorities, panelists, parties and domain evidence surrounding it.

Connected to Westmore UDRP Intelligence
115,948 decisions · citations · panelists · parties · domain history
Eleanor · UDRP intelligence
Ask Eleanor about this decision
Ask Eleanor about this decision

A short, grounded explanation drawn only from this decision's record — not legal advice or a prediction.

Unlocking Eleanor for this case uses 1 of your complimentary Intelligence unlocks· 3 remaining

Grounded in the Westmore record for this decision. Research/informational only — not legal advice or a prediction of any outcome.

Westmore Professional · Unlock the intelligence

The decision is only the beginning.

You've seen what happened. Now discover the deeper intelligence behind the case, the panelist, the parties and the authorities that matter.

Citation Intelligence
How this decision is cited and treated across the corpus.
Panelist Intelligence
The panel's tendencies, outcomes and reasoning patterns.
Domain History
Ownership chronology — creation vs. respondent acquisition.
Opposing-Party Research
Complainant, counsel and portfolio context.
Independent Case Review
Eleanor challenges your filing before the other side does.
Professional Matters
Open, research and manage matters end to end.
$395/month
Unlock Westmore Professional Annual & firm seats available · cancel anytime
Take the next step
Westmore UDRP · find the right service

Westmore UDRP records draw on WIPO-indexed decisions and are provided for research and informational purposes only. Not legal advice, a clearance opinion, or a prediction of any outcome.

Confidential buyer-side representation for premium-domain acquisitions, backed by WHOIS, UDRP and domain-sales intelligence.

or
Buyer-side only Escrow-protected NDA on request
Services
Research
UDRP
Westmore
Support

Copyright © 2026 Westmore. All rights reserved.

Essential cookies only. Nothing is sold or shared.