Westmore · UDRP decision
WIPO · Case No. D2004-0195

Merckindia.com

TransferWIPO-indexed · informational, not legal advice

The case record identifies Merck KGaA as the Complainant, Sunmeet Jolly as the Respondent, and merckindia.com as the disputed domain name. The recorded outcome was transfer. No decision text or substantive panel reasoning was supplied, so the findings on the individual UDRP elements cannot be reported.

Outcome
Transfer
At a glance
Provider
WIPO
Outcome
Transfer
Decision date
2004-05-03
Panelist(s)
Gulliksson, Jonas
Complainant
Merck KGaA
Respondent
Sunmeet Jolly
Disputed domain(s)
merckindia.com
Citation weightCited by 6 later decisions
Domain history UDRP Intelligence

The timeline behind merckindia.com

Registration, the decision and the archived record of what this domain actually displayed — from public RDAP and the Internet Archive.

Reconstructing the record for merckindia.com…
Verified public record
Outcome & remedy
Complaint granted. Panel ordered transfer of merckindia.com.
Reverse Domain Name Hijacking
No RDNH raised.
Westmore Insight

The record establishes the case identity and transfer outcome but does not permit substantive analysis of why the panel ordered transfer. It should therefore be used primarily as disposition metadata rather than as authority for a particular UDRP fact pattern or legal proposition.

The three-part test
Identical or confusingly similarunclear
Rights or legitimate interestsunclear
Registered and used in bad faithunclear

Result of record. The panel's reasoning and decisive facts behind each element are in the Intelligence dossier below.

Case details
Provider
WIPO
Outcome
Transfer
Decision date
2004-05-03
Panel
Gulliksson, Jonas
Full decision

Full decision text is not available in Westmore's current record. The decision below is summarized from the verified public record; you can read the complete decision at the authoritative source.

View original source at WIPO
Beyond the decision

What Westmore sees around merckindia.com

The decision is only the record. Westmore connects it to the cases, authorities, panelists, parties and domain evidence surrounding it.

Connected to Westmore UDRP Intelligence
115,966 decisions · citations · panelists · parties · domain history
Eleanor · UDRP intelligence
Ask Eleanor about this decision
Ask Eleanor about this decision

A short, grounded explanation drawn only from this decision's record — not legal advice or a prediction.

Unlocking Eleanor for this case uses 1 of your complimentary Intelligence unlocks· 3 remaining

Grounded in the Westmore record for this decision. Research/informational only — not legal advice or a prediction of any outcome.

Westmore Professional · Unlock the intelligence

The decision is only the beginning.

You've seen what happened. Now discover the deeper intelligence behind the case, the panelist, the parties and the authorities that matter.

Citation Intelligence
How this decision is cited and treated across the corpus.
Panelist Intelligence
The panel's tendencies, outcomes and reasoning patterns.
Domain History
Ownership chronology — creation vs. respondent acquisition.
Opposing-Party Research
Complainant, counsel and portfolio context.
Independent Case Review
Eleanor challenges your filing before the other side does.
Professional Matters
Open, research and manage matters end to end.
$395/month
Unlock Westmore Professional Annual & firm seats available · cancel anytime
Take the next step
Westmore UDRP · find the right service

Westmore UDRP records draw on WIPO-indexed decisions and are provided for research and informational purposes only. Not legal advice, a clearance opinion, or a prediction of any outcome.

Confidential buyer-side representation for premium-domain acquisitions, backed by WHOIS, UDRP and domain-sales intelligence.

or
Buyer-side only Escrow-protected NDA on request
Services
Research
UDRP
Westmore
Support

Copyright © 2026 Westmore. All rights reserved.

Essential cookies only. Nothing is sold or shared.