Westmore · UDRP decision
WIPO · Case No. D2011-1754

Calvinklein-boxers.com + 4 more domains

TransferWIPO-indexed · informational, not legal advice

The Panel ordered transfer of all five disputed domain names. It found them confusingly similar to the Complainant's CALVIN KLEIN and CALVIN KLEIN UNDERWEAR marks because they incorporated CALVIN KLEIN with product-related or geographic additions. The Complainant established an unrebutted prima facie case that the Respondent lacked rights or legitimate interests. Bad faith under paragraph 4(b)(iv) was established from the commercial websites, their prominent use of the marks and the Complainant's product photographs and descriptions, and the resulting likelihood of confusion.

Outcome
Transfer
At a glance
Provider
WIPO
Outcome
Transfer
Decision date
2011-12-19
Panelist(s)
Soh, Kar Liang
Complainant
Calvin Klein Trademark Trust Warnaco Inc.
Respondent
Chen Jian Rong
Disputed domain(s)
calvinklein-boxers.com, calvinklein-ckunderwear.com, calvinklein-uk.com, calvin-klein-underwears.com + 1 more
Domain history UDRP Intelligence

The timeline behind calvinklein-boxers.com

Registration, the decision and the archived record of what this domain actually displayed — from public RDAP and the Internet Archive.

Westmore reconstructs the full history behind calvinklein-boxers.com — from public RDAP and the Internet Archive — as part of UDRP Intelligence:

Registration → decision → today timeline
Archived Wayback evidence of what the site showed
Registry bad-faith signals
The live current registrant
Available in UDRP Intelligence
Outcome by domain

How each disputed name was decided in this proceeding.

calvinklein-boxers.comTransferred
calvinklein-ckunderwear.comTransferred
calvinklein-uk.comTransferred
calvin-klein-underwears.comTransferred
calvinklein-underwears.comTransferred
Verified public record
Outcome & remedy
Complaint granted. Panel ordered transfer of calvinklein-boxers.com.
Reverse Domain Name Hijacking
No RDNH raised.
Westmore Insight

The decision illustrates a straightforward multiple-domain-name targeting pattern in which a distinctive mark is combined with closely related product terms or a geographic abbreviation and then used for commercial retail websites. The commercial content, including the marks and the Complainant's product photographs and descriptions, supported both awareness at registration and intentional confusion in use.

The three-part test
Identical or Confusingly SimilarMet
Rights or Legitimate InterestsMet
Registered and Used in Bad FaithMet

Result of record. The panel's reasoning and decisive facts behind each element are in the Intelligence dossier below.

Case details
Provider
WIPO
Outcome
Transfer
Decision date
2011-12-19
Panel
Soh, Kar Liang
Full decision
8 min read · hosted by Westmore

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Calvin Klein Trademark Trust, Warnaco Inc. v. Chen Jian Rong Case No. D2011-1754 1. The Parties The Complainants are Calvin Klein Trademark Trust, Warnaco Inc. of New York, United States of America, (together the “Complainant”) represented by Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, United States of America. The Respondent is Chen Jian Rong of Putian, Fujian, China. 2. The Domain Names and Registrars The disputed domain names are <calvinklein-boxers.com>, <calvinklein-uk.com>, <calvinklein-ckunderwear.com>, <calvin-klein-underwears.com> and <calvinklein-underwears.com> (the “Disputed Domain Names”). The Disputed Domain Names <calvinklein-boxers.com> and <calvinklein-uk.com> are registered with Xin Net Technology Corp while the Disputed Domain Names <calvinklein-ckunderwear.com>, <calvin-klein-underwears.com>, and <calvinklein-underwears.com> are registered with Jiangsu Bangning Science & technology Co. Ltd. (together the “Registrars”). 3. Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center (the “Center”) on October 14, 2011. On October 14, 2011, the Center transmitted by email to the Registrars a request for registrar verification in connection with the Disputed Domain Names. On October 15, 2011, and October 17, 2011, the Registrars transmitted by email to the Center its verification response confirming that the Respondent is listed as the registrant and providing the contact details. On October 18, 2011, the Center transmitted an email to the parties in both Chinese and English language regarding the language of proceedings. On October 20, 2011, the Complainant confirmed its request that English be the language of the proceeding. On October 18, 2011, the Respondent sent an email communication to the Center in Chinese, however, the Respondent did not comment on the language of the proceeding. The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”). In accordance with the Rules, paragraphs 2(a) and 4(a), the Center formally notified the Respondent of the Complaint, and the proceedings commenced on October 24, 2011. In accordance with the Rules, paragraph 5(a), the due date for Response was November 13, 2011. The Respondent did not submit any response. Accordingly, the Center confirmed that no further email communications were received from the Respondent on November 14, 2011. The Center appointed Kar Liang Soh as the sole panelist in this matter on December 7, 2011. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted. The Panel has submitted the Statement of Acceptance and Declaration of Impartiality and Independence, as required by the Center to ensure compliance with the Rules, paragraph 7. 4. Factual Background The Complainant is a designer, manufacturer and retailer of, among other articles, intimate apparel under the trademark CALVIN KLEIN. The Complainant and its predecessor have been using the trademark CALVIN KLEIN since 1968. The Complainant has been using the trademark CALVIN KLEIN UNDERWEAR since 1982. The CALVIN KLEIN UNDERWEAR trademark is also used online on the website under the domain name <calvinkleinunderwear.com>. The trademarks CALVIN KLEIN and CALVIN KLEIN UNDERWEAR have been used in over 190 countries and regions in connection with which the Complainant owns various trademark registrations, including the following: Jurisdiction Trademark No. Registration Date United States 1633261 January 29, 1991 CTM 617381 January 29, 1999 China 1681239 December 14, 2001 The Disputed Domain Names were all registered between November 29, 2010 and February 25, 2011. As around the time of the Complaint, all the Disputed Domain Names resolved to websites which purportedly provided online store facilities for purchase of underwear under the Complainant’s marks. The websites feature the Complainant’s marks prominently and incorporate the use of photographs and descriptions by product line of the Complainant goods. On September 7, 2011, the Complainant sent a demand letter to the Respondent’s email addresses associated with the WhoIs record details of the Disputed Domain Names, requiring the Respondent to cease and desist from use of the Complainant’s marks and to transfer the Disputed Domain Names. The Respondent did not reply to the same. 5. Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant The Complainant contends that: a) The Disputed Domain Names are confusingly similar to the Complainant’s marks. The words “boxers”, “uk”, “underwear” added to the words “Calvin Klein” in the Disputed Domain Names are generic terms which do not mitigate confusing similarity between the Disputed Domain Names and the Complainant’s marks; b) The Respondent does not have any rights or legitimate interests in the Disputed Domain Names. The Respondent has no agreement with the Complainant authorizing the Respondent to use the Complainant’s marks. The Respondent does not own any trademark registrations for the words CALVIN KLEIN or CALVIN KLEIN UNDERWEAR and the Respondent is not commonly known by the Disputed Domain Names; and c) The Respondent registered and is using the Disputed Domain Names in bad faith. The Complainant’s marks are well-known. The Respondent could not have registered the Disputed Domain Names coincidentally. The Respondent is using the Disputed Domain Names to misdirect and attract for commercial gain Internet users searching for the Complainant’s goods and services by creating a likelihood of confusion with the Complainant’s marks as to the source, sponsorship, affiliation, or endorsement of the Respondent’s websites and of products on the Respondent’s websites. B. Respondent The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions. 6. Discussion and Findings 6.1. Language of the proceedings The Complainant requests that the proceedings be conducted in English even though the default language of the proceedings should be Chinese in view of the language of the registration agreement being in Chinese. Having regard to circumstances, in particular the following, the Panel determines that English be adopted as the language of the proceedings: a) The websites resolved from the Disputed Domain Names whether directly or by redirection were entirely in English. The Respondent appears to be familiar with English or has the means to deal adequately with the English language; b) Although the Respondent enquired on the consequence of the proceedings following the Center’s communication regarding the language of proceedings, the Respondent has chosen not to respond to the Complaint or made known any preference for the language of the proceedings; c) The Complainant has already been submitted in English and it would be financially onerous on the Complainant to translate the Complaint into Chinese; and d) There does not appear to be any procedural benefit that may be achieved by insisting on the default language of the proceedings and it is likely that delay to the proceedings would result should parties be required to re-submit documents in Chinese. 6.2. Discussion In order to succeed in the proceedings, the Complainant must establish all 3 limbs of paragraph 4(a) of the Policy. The Panel proceeds to consider each of these limbs below. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar Based on the evidence submitted, the Panel agrees that the Complainant has trademark rights in the marks CALVIN KLEIN and CALVIN KLEIN UNDERWEAR. All the Disputed Domain Names entirely incorporate either the mark CALVIN KLEIN or the mark CALVIN KLEIN. The only difference between the Disputed Domain Names and the Complainant’s marks is the addition of suffixes as follows: Disputed Domain Name Suffix Panel’s Comments <calvinklein-boxers.com> boxers This refers to products <calvinklein-uk.com> uk This is a geographical reference to the United Kingdom <calvinklein-ckunderwear.com> ckunderwear This refers to the initial letters of CALVIN KLEIN and products <calvin-klein-underwears.com> underwears This refers to products <calvinklein-underwears.com> underwears This refers to products It is a consensus view of past panel decisions that domain names which incorporate a trademark in their entirety together with suffixes or prefixes which are generic descriptors remain confusingly similar to the trademark. The Panel does not see any special circumstances of the case which demands a different treatment. It is therefore held that the Disputed Domain Names are confusingly similar to the Complainant’s marks and the first limb of paragraph 4(a) is established. B. Rights or Legitimate Interests The Complainant has confirmed the absence of any agreement with the Respondent authorizing the Respondent to use the Complainant’s marks. There is nothing in the facts before the Panel to suggest that the Respondent has any rights or legitimate interests in the Disputed Domain Names. The Complainant has shown prima facie that the Respondent does not have any rights or legitimate interests in the Disputed Domain Names. The prima facie case has not been rebutted and the second limb of paragraph 4(a) is also established. C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith Paragraph 4(b)(iv) of the Policy provides an example of bad faith registration and use as follows: “by using the domain name, you have intentionally attempted to attract, for commercial gain, Internet users to your web site or other on-line location, by creating a likelihood of confusion with the complainant's mark as to the source, sponsorship, affiliation, or endorsement of your web site or location or of a product or service on your web site or location.” The evidence strongly suggests that the websites resolved from the Disputed Domain Names are for commercial gain. The trademark registrations for the Complainant’s marks predate the Disputed Domain Names by almost 2 decades. The adoption of photographs and descriptions of the Complainant’s products on the websites resolved from the Disputed Domain Names corroborates the Complainant’s submission that it is implausible for the Respondent not to have been aware of the Complainant’s marks at the time the Disputed Domain Names were registered. It has already been established above that the Disputed Domain Names are confusingly similar to the Complainant’s marks. Based on the evidence submitted, the Panel accepts that the Respondent has an intention to attract Internet users by creating a likelihood of confusion with the Complainant’s marks as to the source, sponsorship, affiliation, or endorsement of the websites resolved from the Disputed Domain Names and the products thereon. Accordingly, the circumstances fall within the scope of paragraph 4(b)(iv) of the Policy and the third limb of paragraph 4(a). 7. Decision For the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel orders that the Disputed Domain Names, <calvinklein-boxers.com>, <calvinklein-uk.com>, <calvinklein-ckunderwear.com>, <calvin-klein-underwears.com> and <calvinklein-underwears.com>, be transferred to the Complainant. Kar Liang Soh Sole Panelist Dated: December 19, 2011

Source of record: WIPO . Reproduced for research; WIPO is the authoritative source.

Beyond the decision

What Westmore sees around calvinklein-boxers.com

The decision is only the record. Westmore connects it to the cases, authorities, panelists, parties and domain evidence surrounding it.

Connected to Westmore UDRP Intelligence
115,871 decisions · citations · panelists · parties · domain history
Eleanor · UDRP intelligence
Ask Eleanor about this decision
Ask Eleanor about this decision

A short, grounded explanation drawn only from this decision's record — not legal advice or a prediction.

Unlocking Eleanor for this case uses 1 of your complimentary Intelligence unlocks· 3 remaining

Grounded in the Westmore record for this decision. Research/informational only — not legal advice or a prediction of any outcome.

Westmore Professional · Unlock the intelligence

The decision is only the beginning.

You've seen what happened. Now discover the deeper intelligence behind the case, the panelist, the parties and the authorities that matter.

Citation Intelligence
How this decision is cited and treated across the corpus.
Panelist Intelligence
The panel's tendencies, outcomes and reasoning patterns.
Domain History
Ownership chronology — creation vs. respondent acquisition.
Opposing-Party Research
Complainant, counsel and portfolio context.
Independent Case Review
Eleanor challenges your filing before the other side does.
Professional Matters
Open, research and manage matters end to end.
$395/month
Unlock Westmore Professional Annual & firm seats available · cancel anytime
Take the next step
Westmore UDRP · find the right service

Westmore UDRP records draw on WIPO-indexed decisions and are provided for research and informational purposes only. Not legal advice, a clearance opinion, or a prediction of any outcome.

Confidential buyer-side representation for premium-domain acquisitions.

LinkedIn
Insights
Briefs
Who Owns
Westmore
Research
UDRP
Support
Buyer-side only· Escrow-protected· NDA on request

© 2026 Westmore. All rights reserved.

A note on privacy

Westmore uses a few essential cookies to keep this site secure and running smoothly. Nothing about your identity or interest is ever sold or shared.