Westmore · UDRP DecisionNcibuilding-systems.com
The Panel ordered transfer of <ncibuilding-systems.com>. It found the domain confusingly similar to marks in which the Complainant had rights, found no rights or legitimate interests, and found bad-faith registration and use based on use of the domain to impersonate the Complainant, forge the name of its CFO, and seek goods on credit from third parties under the Complainant's identity.
The timeline behind ncibuilding-systems.com
Registration, the decision and the archived record of what this domain actually displayed — from public RDAP and the Internet Archive.
Westmore reconstructs the full history behind ncibuilding-systems.com — from public RDAP and the Internet Archive — as part of UDRP Intelligence:
This decision illustrates a straightforward impersonation-based UDRP dispute in which a minor domain variation—adding a hyphen—was combined with alleged fraudulent procurement activity. The use of the domain to assume the Complainant's identity, forge an officer's name, and seek goods on credit was central to the bad-faith finding. The record also contains a notable registrant-identification issue because a caller using the named Respondent's identity denied registering the domain, but no formal Response or supporting evidence followed.
Result of record. The panel's reasoning and decisive facts behind each element are in the Intelligence dossier below.
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION NCI Group, Inc. v. Natasha Madov Case No. D2016-1152 1. The Parties Complainant is NCI Group, Inc. of Houston, Texas, United States of America (“United States”), represented by Bracewell L.L.P., United States. Respondent is Natasha Madov of Brooklyn, New York, United States. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name <ncibuilding-systems.com> is registered with Ascio Technologies Inc. (the “Registrar”). 3. Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center (the “Center”) on June 8, 2016. On June 8, 2016, the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a request for registrar verification in connection with the disputed domain name. On June 9, 2016, the Registrar transmitted by email to the Center its verification response confirming that Respondent is listed as the registrant and providing the contact details. The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”). In accordance with the Rules, paragraphs 2 and 4, the Center formally notified Respondent of the Complaint, and the proceedings commenced on June 24, 2016. In accordance with the Rules, paragraph 5, the due date for Response was July 14, 2016. Respondent did not submit any response. Accordingly, the Center notified Respondent’s default on July 15, 2016. On July 7, 2016, the Center received a phone call from an individual who indicated she was Natasha Madov, but also claimed that she had not registered the domain name, and that she did not use the phone number or email address indicated in the Written Notice she received by courier. The Center emailed the Parties on July 8, 2016, notifying them of the Respondent identification issue. The Center appointed M. Scott Donahey as the sole panelist in this matter on July 26, 2016. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted. The Panel has submitted the Statement of Acceptance and Declaration of Impartiality and Independence, as required by the Center to ensure compliance with the Rules, paragraph 7. 4. Factual Background Complainant has been doing business as NCI Building systems for approximately twenty-five years. Respondent has trademark registrations with the USPTO for the marks NCI BUILDINGS GROUP, NCI, and NCI BUILDING COMPONENTS, the latter two registrations issuing on January 7, 1997. Complaint, Annex 6. Complainant is in the business of operating wholesale distributorships of metal building products. Id. Complainant is the registrant of the domain name <ncibuildingsystems.com> whose registration predates the registration of the disputed domain name by more than a year. Complaint, Annex 5. Respondent registered the disputed domain name on May 26, 2016. Complaint, Annex 1. Respondent used the disputed domain name to attempt to buy equipment on credit under Complainant’s name. Complaint, Annex 7. 5. Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant Complainant contends that the domain name at issue is confusingly similar to the trademarks in which Complainant has rights and is identical to, other than the insertion of a hyphen, to Complainant’s registered domain name, that Complainant has no right or legitimate interest in respect of the domain name at issue and has not been authorized by Complainant to use its trademarks or its domain name, and that Respondent has registered and is using the domain name at issue in a fraudulent scheme to obtain credit, including by the forging of the name of Complainant’s CFO in order to obtain credit under Complainant’s name for the purchase of goods from third parties. B. Respondent Respondent did not reply to Complainant’s contentions. 6. Discussion and Findings Paragraph 15(a) of the Rules instructs the Panel as to the principles the Panel is to use in determining the dispute: “A Panel shall decide a complaint on the basis of the statements and documents submitted in accordance with the Policy, these Rules and any rules and principles of law that it deems applicable.” Paragraph 4(a) of the Policy directs that the complainant must prove each of the following: 1) that the domain name registered by the respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights; and, 2) that the respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name; and, 3) that the domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The domain name at issue consists of Complainant’s registered domain name with a hyphen inserted between “ncibuilding” and “systems” and incorporates Complainant’s NCI mark and portions of Complainant’s NCI BUILDINGS GROUP and NCI BUILDING COMPONENTS marks. Accordingly, the Panel finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to marks in which Complainant has rights. B. Rights or Legitimate Interests The consensus view of WIPO panelists concerning the burden of establishing no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name is as follows: While the overall burden of proof rests with the complainant, panels have recognized that this could result in the often impossible task of proving a negative, requiring information that is often primarily within the knowledge of the respondent. Therefore, a complainant is required to make out an initial prima facie case that the respondent lacks rights or legitimate interests. Once such prima facie case is made, respondent carries the burden of demonstrating rights or legitimate interests in the domain name. If the respondent fails to come forward with such appropriate allegations or evidence, a complainant is generally deemed to have satisfied paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the UDRP. WIPO Overview of WIPO Panel Views on Selected UDRP Questions , Second Edition (“WIPO Overview, 2.0”), paragraph 2.1. In the present case Complainant alleges that Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain names and Respondent has failed to assert any such rights. Accordingly, the Panel finds that Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain names. C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith Respondent has used the disputed domain name to falsely portray itself as Complainant, to forge the name of Complainant’s CFO, and to seek to obtain goods on credit by representing to third parties that it is Complainant. Accordingly, the Panel finds that Respondent has registered and is using the domain name at issue in bad faith. 7. Decision For the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel orders that the disputed domain name <ncibuilding-systems.com> be transferred to Complainant. M. Scott Donahey Sole Panelist Date: July 26, 2016
Source of record: WIPO . Reproduced for research; WIPO is the authoritative source.
What Westmore sees around ncibuilding-systems.com
The decision is only the record. Westmore connects it to the cases, authorities, panelists, parties and domain evidence surrounding it.
A short, grounded explanation drawn only from this decision's record — not legal advice or a prediction.
Grounded in the Westmore record for this decision. Research/informational only — not legal advice or a prediction of any outcome.
The decision is only the beginning.
You've seen what happened. Now discover the deeper intelligence behind the case, the panelist, the parties and the authorities that matter.
Go beyond the public record: see how this case has been cited, find comparable decisions, analyze the panelist and apply the relevant authorities to your Matter.
Westmore Professional · $395/month
Research with UDRP IntelligenceWestmore AI drafts an attorney-review-ready UDRP response from your facts, grounded in the exact panel and closest precedent.
$895 one-time per matter · no subscription required. Self-help drafting aid — not legal advice.
Build your responseWestmore UDRP records draw on WIPO-indexed decisions and are provided for research and informational purposes only. Not legal advice, a clearance opinion, or a prediction of any outcome.