Westmore · UDRP DecisionEpipenonline.com
The Panel ordered cancellation of <epipenonline.com> solely on the basis of the Respondent’s consent. In informal email communications, the Respondent stated that he wished to resolve the dispute, had removed the website, and had asked the Registrar to cancel the registration. The Panel therefore did not decide the three substantive UDRP elements.
The timeline behind epipenonline.com
Registration, the decision and the archived record of what this domain actually displayed — from public RDAP and the Internet Archive.
Westmore reconstructs the full history behind epipenonline.com — from public RDAP and the Internet Archive — as part of UDRP Intelligence:
This is a consent-disposition case rather than a substantive UDRP precedent. Its principal research value lies in showing that a panel may order cancellation without analyzing the three UDRP elements when the respondent clearly declines to contest the case and does not wish to retain the registration.
Result of record. The panel's reasoning and decisive facts behind each element are in the Intelligence dossier below.
ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Mylan Inc. v. cory dingle Case No. D2024-5199 1. The Parties The Complainant is Mylan Inc., United States of America, represented by Viatris Inc., United States of America. The Respondent is cory dingle, Canada. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name <epipenonline.com> is registered with NameCheap, Inc. (the “Registrar”). 3. Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center (the “Center”) on December 18, 2024. On December 18, 2024, the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a request for registrar verification in connection with the disputed domain name. On December 18, 2024, the Registrar transmitted by email to the Center its verification response disclosing registrant and contact information for the disputed domain name which differed from the named Respondent (Redacted for Privacy, Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf) and contact information in the Complaint. The Center sent an email communication to the Complainant on December 20, 2024, providing the registrant and contact information disclosed by the Registrar, and inviting the Complainant to submit an amendment to the Complaint. The Complainant filed an amended Complaint on December 20, 2024. The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”). In accordance with the Rules, paragraphs 2 and 4, the Center formally notified the Respondent of the Complaint, and the proceeding commenced on December 23, 2024. In accordance with the Rules, paragraph 5, the due date for Response was January 12, 2025. page 2 The Respondent sent email communications to the Center on December 27, 2024, and January 13, 2025. The Center appointed Sebastian M.W. Hughes as the sole panelist in this matter on January 21, 2025. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted. The Panel has submitted the Statement of Acceptance and Declaration of Impartiality and Independence, as required by the Center to ensure compliance with the Rules, paragraph 7. 4. Consent to Transfer In his informal email communications, the Respondent notified the Center that he wished to resolve this dispute, that the website at the disputed domain had been removed, and that he had requested the Registrar to cancel his registration of the disputed domain name. In light of the Respondent’s clear indication that he does not wish to contest this proceeding and that he does not wish to maintain his registration of the disputed domain name, the Panel considers, in the circumstances, it is appropriate to order cancellation of the disputed domain name solely on the basis of consent (see WIPO Overview of WIPO Panel Views on Selected UDRP Questions, Third Edition, (“WIPO Overview 3.0”), section 4.10). 5. Decision For the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel orders that the disputed domain name <epipenonline.com> be cancelled. /Sebastian M.W. Hughes/ Sebastian M.W. Hughes Sole Panelist Date: February 4, 2025
Source of record: WIPO . Reproduced for research; WIPO is the authoritative source.
What Westmore sees around epipenonline.com
The decision is only the record. Westmore connects it to the cases, authorities, panelists, parties and domain evidence surrounding it.

A short, grounded explanation drawn only from this decision's record — not legal advice or a prediction.
Grounded in the Westmore record for this decision. Research/informational only — not legal advice or a prediction of any outcome.
The decision is only the beginning.
You've seen what happened. Now discover the deeper intelligence behind the case, the panelist, the parties and the authorities that matter.
Go beyond the public record: see how this case has been cited, find comparable decisions, analyze the panelist and apply the relevant authorities to your Matter.
Westmore Professional · $395/month
Research with UDRP IntelligenceWestmore AI drafts an attorney-review-ready UDRP response from your facts, grounded in the exact panel and closest precedent.
$895 one-time per matter · no subscription required. Self-help drafting aid — not legal advice.
Build your responseWestmore UDRP records draw on WIPO-indexed decisions and are provided for research and informational purposes only. Not legal advice, a clearance opinion, or a prediction of any outcome.