Westmore · UDRP decision
WIPO · Case No. D2025-3619

Fmwhatapp.com

TransferWIPO-indexed · informational, not legal advice

The Panel ordered transfer of <fmwhatapp.com> based solely on the Respondent’s on-record consent to transfer. It did not determine the three substantive UDRP elements. The Panel applied the consent-to-transfer approach described in WIPO Overview 3.0, section 4.10.

Outcome
Transfer
At a glance
Provider
WIPO
Outcome
Transfer
Decision date
2025-11-04
Panelist(s)
Burgstaller, Peter
Complainant
WhatsApp, LLC
Respondent
Nauman Shahid
Disputed domain(s)
fmwhatapp.com
Citation weightCited by 1 later decision · relies on 2 authorities
Domain history UDRP Intelligence

The timeline behind fmwhatapp.com

Registration, the decision and the archived record of what this domain actually displayed — from public RDAP and the Internet Archive.

Reconstructing the record for fmwhatapp.com…
Verified public record
Outcome & remedy
Complaint granted. Panel ordered transfer of fmwhatapp.com.
Reverse Domain Name Hijacking
No RDNH raised.
Westmore Insight

This case illustrates a procedural transfer based on express respondent consent rather than a merits determination. It should not be treated as authority that <fmwhatapp.com> was found confusingly similar, that the Respondent lacked rights or legitimate interests, or that the domain was registered and used in bad faith.

The three-part test
Identical or confusingly similarnot_reached
Rights or legitimate interestsnot_reached
Registration and use in bad faithnot_reached

Result of record. The panel's reasoning and decisive facts behind each element are in the Intelligence dossier below.

Related decisions
Case details
Provider
WIPO
Outcome
Transfer
Decision date
2025-11-04
Panel
Burgstaller, Peter
Full decision
4 min read · hosted by Westmore

ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION WhatsApp, LLC v. Nauman Shahid Case No. D2025-3619 1. The Parties The Complainant is WhatsApp, LLC, United States of America (“United States” or “U.S.”), represented by Perkins Coie LLP, United States. The Respondent is Nauman Shahid, Pakistan. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name <fmwhatapp.com> is registered with OwnRegistrar, Inc. (the “Registrar”). 3. Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center (the “Center”) on September 5, 2025. On September 8, 2025, the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a request for registrar verification in connection with the disputed domain name. On September 8, 2025, the Registrar transmitted by email to the Center its verification response disclosing registrant and contact information for the disputed domain name which differed from the named Respondent (Redacted for Privacy (DT), WhoisSecure) and contact information in the Complaint. The Center sent an email communication to the Complainant on September 9, 2025, providing the registrant and contact information disclosed by the Registrar, and inviting the Complainant to submit an amendment to the Complaint. The Complainant filed an amended Complaint on September 12, 2025. The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”). In accordance with the Rules, paragraphs 2 and 4, the Center formally notified the Respondent of the Complaint, and the proceedings commenced on September 16, 2025. In accordance with the Rules, paragraph 5, the due date for Response was October 6, 2025. The Respondent sent an email communication to the Center on September 16, 2025, stating: “I would like to clarify that I am not using the domain fmwhatapp.com to impersonate, mislead, or in any way act against WhatsApp or its services. The domain was purchased solely for testing and personal learning purposes, page 2 particularly for practicing web design. At no point have I allowed users to download WhatsApp from the website, nor have I presented any misleading content or functionality associated with the WhatsApp brand. I understand the concerns and am willing to cooperate fully. If necessary, I am ready to delete or transfer the domain to resolve this matter amicably and avoid any potential misunderstanding or infringement. Please let me know how you would prefer I proceed.” The Center appointed Peter Burgstaller as the sole panelist in this matter on October 21, 2025. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted. The Panel has submitted the Statement of Acceptance and Declaration of Impartiality and Independence, as required by the Center to ensure compliance with the Rules, paragraph 7. 4. Factual Background The Complainant operates the WhatsApp messaging and voice-over-IP service and mobile application in various languages. The Complainant owns various trademark registrations for the mark WHATSAPP in many jurisdictions around the world, including United States Registration No. 3939463, registered on April 5, 2011. The disputed domain name was registered on January 21, 2025, and resolves to a website that purportedly offers a modified version of the Complainant’s WHATSAPP messaging service. 5. Discussion and Findings The Respondent has confirmed with the Center that he consents to the transfer of the disputed domain name to the Complainant and the Complainant requested the transfer of the disputed domain name in its Complaint. Where parties to a UDRP proceeding have not been able to settle their dispute prior to the issuance of a panel decision using the “standard settlement process” (as in the present case), but where the respondent has nevertheless given its consent on the record to the transfer (or cancellation) remedy sought by the complainant (in this case: email communication of the Respondent to the Center on September 16, 2025), many panels will order the requested remedy solely on the basis of such consent. In such cases, the panel gives effect to an understood party agreement as to the disposition of their case (whether by virtue of deemed admission, or on a no-fault basis). See WIPO Overview of WIPO Panel Views on Selected UDRP Questions, Third Edition (WIPO Overview 3.0), section 4.10; see also e.g. The Cartoon Network LP, LLLP v. Mike Morgan, WIPO Case No. D2005-1132 <cartoonetworkya.com> et.al; Leica Microsystems IR GmbH v. Tong Chuang, WIPO Case No. D2016-2316, <leica.store>. The Panel accordingly orders transfer of the disputed domain name on the basis of the Respondent’s consent. 5. Decision For the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel orders that the disputed domain name <fmwhatapp.com> be transferred to the Complainant. /Peter Burgstaller/ Peter Burgstaller Sole Panelist Date: November 4, 2025

Source of record: WIPO . Reproduced for research; WIPO is the authoritative source.

Beyond the decision

What Westmore sees around fmwhatapp.com

The decision is only the record. Westmore connects it to the cases, authorities, panelists, parties and domain evidence surrounding it.

Connected to Westmore UDRP Intelligence
116,051 decisions · citations · panelists · parties · domain history
Eleanor · UDRP intelligence
Ask Eleanor about this decision
Ask Eleanor about this decision

A short, grounded explanation drawn only from this decision's record — not legal advice or a prediction.

Unlocking Eleanor for this case uses 1 of your complimentary Intelligence unlocks· 3 remaining

Grounded in the Westmore record for this decision. Research/informational only — not legal advice or a prediction of any outcome.

Westmore Professional · Unlock the intelligence

The decision is only the beginning.

You've seen what happened. Now discover the deeper intelligence behind the case, the panelist, the parties and the authorities that matter.

Citation Intelligence
How this decision is cited and treated across the corpus.
Panelist Intelligence
The panel's tendencies, outcomes and reasoning patterns.
Domain History
Ownership chronology — creation vs. respondent acquisition.
Opposing-Party Research
Complainant, counsel and portfolio context.
Independent Case Review
Eleanor challenges your filing before the other side does.
Professional Matters
Open, research and manage matters end to end.
$395/month
Unlock Westmore Professional Annual & firm seats available · cancel anytime
Take the next step
Westmore UDRP · find the right service

Westmore UDRP records draw on WIPO-indexed decisions and are provided for research and informational purposes only. Not legal advice, a clearance opinion, or a prediction of any outcome.

Essential cookies only. Nothing is sold or shared.