Westmore · UDRP decision
FORUM · Case No. FA0702000910715

Metfife.com

TransferFORUM-indexed · informational, not legal advice

The Panel ordered transfer of <metfife.com> based on Respondent’s request for transfer and Complainant’s lack of objection, without making findings under the three UDRP elements.

Outcome
Transfer
At a glance
Provider
FORUM
Outcome
Transfer
Decision date
2007-03-21
Panelist(s)
David E. Sorkin
Complainant
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Respondent
Secure Whois Information Service c/o DNS Admin
Counsel
Heidi C. Constantine
Disputed domain(s)
metfife.com
Citation weightCited by 19 later decisions
Domain history UDRP Intelligence

The timeline behind metfife.com

Registration, the decision and the archived record of what this domain actually displayed — from public RDAP and the Internet Archive.

Westmore reconstructs the full history behind metfife.com — from public RDAP and the Internet Archive — as part of UDRP Intelligence:

Registration → decision → today timeline
Archived Wayback evidence of what the site showed
Registry bad-faith signals
The live current registrant
Available in UDRP Intelligence
Verified public record
Outcome & remedy
Complaint granted. Panel ordered transfer of metfife.com.
Reverse Domain Name Hijacking
No RDNH raised.
Westmore Insight

The Panel declined to make findings under Policy paragraph 4(a) because Respondent requested transfer without findings and Complainant did not object.

The three-part test
Identical or confusingly similarnot_reached
Rights or legitimate interestsnot_reached
Registered and used in bad faithnot_reached

Result of record. The panel's reasoning and decisive facts behind each element are in the Intelligence dossier below.

Case details
Provider
FORUM
Outcome
Transfer
Decision date
2007-03-21
Panel
David E. Sorkin
Full decision
3 min read · hosted by Westmore

NATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM DECISION Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Secure Whois Information Service c/o DNS Admin Claim Number: FA0702000910715 PARTIES Complainant is Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“Complainant”), represented by Heidi C. Constantine, of Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, 1 MetLife Plaza, 27-01 Queens Plaza North, Long Island City, NY 11101. Respondent is Secure Whois Information Service c/o DNS Admin (“Respondent”), represented by Victoria Onyos, 56 Man Gir, Barcelona 08034, Spain. REGISTRAR AND DISPUTED DOMAIN NAME The domain name at issue is <metfife.com>, registered with Name.Net LLC. PANEL The undersigned certifies that he has acted independently and impartially and to the best of his knowledge has no known conflict in serving as Panelist in this proceeding. David E. Sorkin as Panelist. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Complainant submitted a Complaint to the National Arbitration Forum electronically on February 5, 2007; the National Arbitration Forum received a hard copy of the Complaint on February 5, 2007. On February 6, 2007, Name.Net LLC confirmed by e-mail to the National Arbitration Forum that the <metfife.com> domain name is registered with Name.Net LLC and that the Respondent is the current registrant of the name. Name.Net LLC has verified that Respondent is bound by the Name.Net LLC registration agreement and has thereby agreed to resolve domain-name disputes brought by third parties in accordance with ICANN’s Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy”). On February 9, 2007, a Notification of Complaint and Commencement of Administrative Proceeding (the “Commencement Notification”), setting a deadline of March 1, 2007 by which Respondent could file a Response to the Complaint, was transmitted to Respondent via e-mail, post and fax, to all entities and persons listed on Respondent’s registration as technical, administrative and billing contacts, and to postmaster@metfife.com by e-mail. A Response, captioned “Response / Stipulation of Transfer,” was received in hard copy on March 1, 2007. Respondent failed to submit an electronic version of the Response to the Forum at the address specified in the Forum’s Supplemental Rule 5(a). The electronic version of the Response apparently was sent instead to the registrar, which forwarded it to the Forum on March 1, 2007. The Panel deems any procedural deficiencies in the submission of the Response to be inconsequential. On March 7, 2007, pursuant to Complainant’s request to have the dispute decided by a single-member Panel, the National Arbitration Forum appointed David E. Sorkin as Panelist. On March 8, 2007, the Panel entered a procedural order noting Respondent’s request that the Panel enter an order transferring the disputed domain name to Complainant without findings of fact on the elements set forth in Paragraph 4(a) of the Policy, and directing Complainant to file any objections to that request no later than March 15, 2007. Complainant did not file an objection pursuant to the Panel’s procedural order. RELIEF SOUGHT Complainant requests that the domain name be transferred from Respondent to Complainant. PARTIES’ CONTENTIONS In light of Respondent’s request that the Panel enter an order transferring the disputed domain name to Complainant without findings of fact on the elements set forth in Paragraph 4(a) of the Policy, and the lack of any objection thereto, the Panel declines to set forth or address the Parties’ contentions. FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION In light of Respondent’s aforementioned request and the lack of any objection thereto, the Panel declines to enter findings in this matter, and grants the Parties’ request that the disputed domain name be transferred to Complainant. DECISION The Panel concludes that relief shall be GRANTED. Accordingly, it is Ordered that the <metfife.com> domain name be TRANSFERRED from Respondent to Complainant. David E. Sorkin, Panelist Dated: March 21, 2007 Click Here to return to the main Domain Decisions Page. Click Here to return to our Home Page NATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM

Source of record: FORUM . Reproduced for research; FORUM is the authoritative source.

Beyond the decision

What Westmore sees around metfife.com

The decision is only the record. Westmore connects it to the cases, authorities, panelists, parties and domain evidence surrounding it.

Connected to Westmore UDRP Intelligence
115,979 decisions · citations · panelists · parties · domain history
Eleanor · UDRP intelligence
Ask Eleanor about this decision
Ask Eleanor about this decision

A short, grounded explanation drawn only from this decision's record — not legal advice or a prediction.

Unlocking Eleanor for this case uses 1 of your complimentary Intelligence unlocks· 3 remaining

Grounded in the Westmore record for this decision. Research/informational only — not legal advice or a prediction of any outcome.

Westmore Professional · Unlock the intelligence

The decision is only the beginning.

You've seen what happened. Now discover the deeper intelligence behind the case, the panelist, the parties and the authorities that matter.

Citation Intelligence
How this decision is cited and treated across the corpus.
Panelist Intelligence
The panel's tendencies, outcomes and reasoning patterns.
Domain History
Ownership chronology — creation vs. respondent acquisition.
Opposing-Party Research
Complainant, counsel and portfolio context.
Independent Case Review
Eleanor challenges your filing before the other side does.
Professional Matters
Open, research and manage matters end to end.
$395/month
Unlock Westmore Professional Annual & firm seats available · cancel anytime
Take the next step
Westmore UDRP · find the right service

Westmore UDRP records draw on FORUM-indexed decisions and are provided for research and informational purposes only. Not legal advice, a clearance opinion, or a prediction of any outcome.

Essential cookies only. Nothing is sold or shared.