Westmore · UDRP decision
FORUM · Case No. FA0703000945379

Disneycasting.com

TransferFORUM-indexed · informational, not legal advice

The Panel ordered transfer of <disneycasting.com> after Respondent consented. In light of that consent and the famous nature of Complainant's business activities and marks, the Panel expressly declined to conduct the traditional UDRP analysis.

Outcome
Transfer
At a glance
Provider
FORUM
Outcome
Transfer
Decision date
2007-05-17
Panelist(s)
Sandra J. Franklin
Complainant
Disney Enterprises, Inc.
Respondent
Texas International Property Associates
Counsel
Annie S. Wang
Law firm
J. Andrew Coombs, A Professional Corporation; Law Office of Gary Wayne Tucker
Disputed domain(s)
disneycasting.com
Citation weightrelies on 2 authorities
Domain history UDRP Intelligence

The timeline behind disneycasting.com

Registration, the decision and the archived record of what this domain actually displayed — from public RDAP and the Internet Archive.

Westmore reconstructs the full history behind disneycasting.com — from public RDAP and the Internet Archive — as part of UDRP Intelligence:

Registration → decision → today timeline
Archived Wayback evidence of what the site showed
Registry bad-faith signals
The live current registrant
Available in UDRP Intelligence
Verified public record
Outcome & remedy
Complaint granted. Panel ordered transfer of disneycasting.com.
Reverse Domain Name Hijacking
No RDNH raised.
Westmore Insight

The Panel made no formal finding on bad-faith registration or use because Respondent consented to transfer and formal analysis was deemed unnecessary.

The three-part test
Identical or confusingly similarnot_reached
Rights or legitimate interestsnot_reached
Registered and used in bad faithnot_reached

Result of record. The panel's reasoning and decisive facts behind each element are in the Intelligence dossier below.

Related decisions
Case details
Provider
FORUM
Outcome
Transfer
Decision date
2007-05-17
Panel
Sandra J. Franklin
Full decision
3 min read · hosted by Westmore

NATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM DECISION Disney Enterprises, Inc. v. Texas International Property Associates Claim Number: FA0703000945379 PARTIES Complainant is Disney Enterprises, Inc. (“Complainant”), represented by Annie S. Wang, of J. Andrew Coombs, A Professional Corporation, 450 North Brand Boulevard, Suite 600, Glendale, CA 91203-2349. Respondent is Texas International Property Associates (“Respondent”), represented by Gary Wayne Tucker, of Law Office of Gary Wayne Tucker, PO Box 703431, Dallas, TX 75370. REGISTRAR AND DISPUTED DOMAIN NAME The domain name at issue is <disneycasting.com>, registered with Compana, Llc. PANEL The undersigned certifies that she has acted independently and impartially and to the best of her knowledge has no known conflict in serving as Panelist in this proceeding. Sandra J. Franklin as Panelist. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Complainant submitted a Complaint to the National Arbitration Forum electronically on March 26, 2007; the National Arbitration Forum received a hard copy of the Complaint on March 27, 2007. On April 4, 2007, Compana, Llc confirmed by e-mail to the National Arbitration Forum that the <disneycasting.com> domain name is registered with Compana, Llc and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name. Compana, Llc has verified that Respondent is bound by the Compana, Llc registration agreement and has thereby agreed to resolve domain-name disputes brought by third parties in accordance with ICANN’s Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy”). On April 6, 2007, a Notification of Complaint and Commencement of Administrative Proceeding (the “Commencement Notification”), setting a deadline of April 26, 2007 by which Respondent could file a Response to the Complaint, was transmitted to Respondent via e-mail, post and fax, to all entities and persons listed on Respondent’s registration as technical, administrative and billing contacts, and to postmaster@disneycasting.com by e-mail. A timely Response was received and determined to be complete on April 26, 2007. On May 3, 2007, pursuant to Complainant’s request to have the dispute decided by a single-member Panel, the National Arbitration Forum appointed Sandra J. Franklin as Panelist. RELIEF SOUGHT Complainant requests that the domain name be transferred from Respondent to Complainant. PARTIES’ CONTENTIONS A. Complainant makes the following assertions: 1. Respondent’s <disneycasting.com> domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant’s DISNEY mark. 2. Respondent does not have any rights or legitimate interests in the <disneycasting.com> domain name. 3. Respondent registered and used the <disneycasting.com> domain name in bad faith. B. Respondent agreed to the transfer of the domain name to Complainant and requested that the Panel refrain from making any specific findings in this case. FINDINGS The Panel finds that, due to Respondent’s consent and to the famous nature of Complainant Disney’s business activities and marks, it is not necessary, nor would it be instructive, to make a formal analysis in this case. See Boehringer Ingelheim Int’l GmbH v. Modern Ltd. – Cayman Web Dev., FA 133625 (Nat. Arb. Forum Jan. 9, 2003) (transferring the domain name registration where the respondent stipulated to the transfer); see also Disney Enters., Inc. v. Morales, FA 475191 (Nat. Arb. Forum June 24, 2005) (“[U]nder such circumstances, where Respondent has agreed to comply with Complainant’s request, the Panel felt it to be expedient and judicial to forego the traditional UDRP analysis and order the transfer of the domain names.”). DECISION Therefore, the Panel concludes that relief shall be GRANTED. Accordingly, it is Ordered that the <disneycasting.com> domain name be TRANSFERRED from Respondent to Complainant. Sandra J. Franklin, Panelist Dated: May 17, 2007 Click Here to return to the main Domain Decisions Page. Click Here to return to our Home Page NATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM

Source of record: FORUM . Reproduced for research; FORUM is the authoritative source.

Beyond the decision

What Westmore sees around disneycasting.com

The decision is only the record. Westmore connects it to the cases, authorities, panelists, parties and domain evidence surrounding it.

Connected to Westmore UDRP Intelligence
116,047 decisions · citations · panelists · parties · domain history
Eleanor · UDRP intelligence
Ask Eleanor about this decision
Ask Eleanor about this decision

A short, grounded explanation drawn only from this decision's record — not legal advice or a prediction.

Unlocking Eleanor for this case uses 1 of your complimentary Intelligence unlocks· 3 remaining

Grounded in the Westmore record for this decision. Research/informational only — not legal advice or a prediction of any outcome.

Westmore Professional · Unlock the intelligence

The decision is only the beginning.

You've seen what happened. Now discover the deeper intelligence behind the case, the panelist, the parties and the authorities that matter.

Citation Intelligence
How this decision is cited and treated across the corpus.
Panelist Intelligence
The panel's tendencies, outcomes and reasoning patterns.
Domain History
Ownership chronology — creation vs. respondent acquisition.
Opposing-Party Research
Complainant, counsel and portfolio context.
Independent Case Review
Eleanor challenges your filing before the other side does.
Professional Matters
Open, research and manage matters end to end.
$395/month
Unlock Westmore Professional Annual & firm seats available · cancel anytime
Take the next step
Westmore UDRP · find the right service

Westmore UDRP records draw on FORUM-indexed decisions and are provided for research and informational purposes only. Not legal advice, a clearance opinion, or a prediction of any outcome.

Essential cookies only. Nothing is sold or shared.