Westmore · UDRP decision
FORUM · Case No. FA0807001214416

Kellyserivces.com

TransferFORUM-indexed · informational, not legal advice

The Panel ordered transfer of <kellyserivces.com> after Respondent agreed to Complainant’s requested relief. Because both parties requested transfer, the Panel expressly declined to conduct the traditional UDRP analysis.

Outcome
Transfer
At a glance
Provider
FORUM
Outcome
Transfer
Decision date
2008-08-22
Panelist(s)
Luiz Edgard Montaury Pimenta
Complainant
Kelly Properties, Inc.
Respondent
Texas International Property Associates-NA NA
Counsel
Elizabeth K. Brock
Law firm
Harness, Dickey & Pierce, P.L.C.; Law Office of Gary Wayne Tucker
Disputed domain(s)
kellyserivces.com
Citation weightrelies on 3 authorities
Domain history UDRP Intelligence

The timeline behind kellyserivces.com

Registration, the decision and the archived record of what this domain actually displayed — from public RDAP and the Internet Archive.

Reconstructing the record for kellyserivces.com…
Verified public record
Outcome & remedy
Complaint granted. Panel ordered transfer of kellyserivces.com.
Reverse Domain Name Hijacking
No RDNH raised.
Westmore Insight

The Panel made no finding of bad-faith registration or use because it ordered transfer by consent without conducting the traditional UDRP analysis.

The three-part test
Identical or confusingly similarnot_reached
Rights or legitimate interestsnot_reached
Registered and used in bad faithnot_reached

Result of record. The panel's reasoning and decisive facts behind each element are in the Intelligence dossier below.

Related decisions
Case details
Provider
FORUM
Outcome
Transfer
Decision date
2008-08-22
Panel
Luiz Edgard Montaury Pimenta
Full decision
5 min read · hosted by Westmore

NATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM DECISION Kelly Properties, Inc. v. Texas International Property Associates-NA NA Claim Number: FA0807001214416 PARTIES Complainant is Kelly Properties, Inc. (“Complainant”), represented by Elizabeth K. Brock, of Harness, Dickey & Pierce, P.L.C., Michigan, USA. Respondent is Texas International Property Associates-NA NA (“Respondent”), represented by Gary Wayne Tucker, of Law Office of Gary Wayne Tucker, Texas, USA. REGISTRAR AND DISPUTED DOMAIN NAME The domain name at issue is <kellyserivces.com>, registered with Compana, LLC. PANEL The undersigned certifies that he or she has acted independently and impartially and to the best of his or her knowledge has no known conflict in serving as Panelist in this proceeding. Luiz Edgard Montaury Pimenta as Panelist. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Complainant submitted a Complaint to the National Arbitration Forum electronically on July 9, 2008; the National Arbitration Forum received a hard copy of the Complaint on July 10, 2008. On July 10, 2008, Compana, LLC confirmed by e-mail to the National Arbitration Forum that the <kellyserivces.com> domain name is registered with Compana, LLC and that the Respondent is the current registrant of the name. Compana, LLC has verified that Respondent is bound by the Compana, LLC registration agreement and has thereby agreed to resolve domain-name disputes brought by third parties in accordance with ICANN’s Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy”). On July 14, 2008, a Notification of Complaint and Commencement of Administrative Proceeding (the “Commencement Notification”), setting a deadline of August 4, 2008 by which Respondent could file a Response to the Complaint, was transmitted to Respondent via e-mail, post and fax, to all entities and persons listed on Respondent’s registration as technical, administrative and billing contacts, and to postmaster@kellyserivces.com by e-mail. A timely Response was received and determined to be complete on August 4, 2008. On August 8, 2008, pursuant to Complainant’s request to have the dispute decided by a single-member Panel, the National Arbitration Forum appointed Mr. Luiz Edgard Montaury Pimenta as Panelist. RELIEF SOUGHT Complainant requests that the domain name be transferred from Respondent to Complainant. PARTIES’ CONTENTIONS A. Complainant Complainant contends that: 1. Respondent’s <kellyserivces.com> domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant’s KELLY SERVICES mark. 2. Respondent does not have any rights or legitimate interests in the <kellyserivces.com> domain name, because no bona fide offering of goods or services is made; Respondent is not known by the domain name; and no legitimate or fair use of the domain name is made. 3. Respondent registered and used the <kellyserivces.com> domain name in bad faith. B. Respondent Respondent contends that: 1. Complainant had never contacted Respondent to complain about the disputed domain name prior to the institution of this proceeding; 2. Had Complainant done so, Respondent would have agreed to transfer the disputed domain; 3. Therefore, Respondent agrees to the relief requested by the Complainant. FINDINGS Complainant, Kelly Properties, Inc., is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Kelly Services, Inc., which operates as a personnel services company in 30 countries and territories. Complainant furnishes a variety of workers for businesses, including full-time, part-time, skilled, and unskilled employees. Since at least 1965, Complainant has operated under the KELLY SERVICES mark (Reg. No. 834,892 issued September 5, 1967), which was registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”). Complainant also owns and operates the <kellyservices.com> domain name in conjunction with its provision of online employment databases. Respondent registered the <kellyserivces.com> domain name on December 10, 2004. Respondent is currently using the disputed domain name to host a website that predominantly features third-party links to employment service businesses that operate in direct competition with Complainant. DISCUSSION Paragraph 15(a) of the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”) instructs this Panel to “decide a complaint on the basis of the statements and documents submitted in accordance with the Policy, these Rules and any rules and principles of law that it deems applicable.” In this case, both parties have requested that the domain name be transferred from Respondent to Complainant. As a result, the Panel decides that, as Respondent has not contested the transfer of the disputed domain name but instead has agreed to transfer the disputed domain name to Complainant, the Panel decides to forego the traditional UDRP analysis and order the immediate transfer of the disputed domain name <kellyserivces.com>. See Boehringer Ingelheim Int’l GmbH v. Modern Ltd. – Cayman Web Dev., FA 133625 (Nat. Arb. Forum Jan. 9, 2003) (transferring the domain name registration where the respondent stipulated to the transfer); see also Malev Hungarian Airlines, Ltd. v. Vertical Axis Inc., FA 212653 (Nat Arb. Forum Jan. 13, 2004) (“In this case, the parties have both asked for the domain name to be transferred to the Complainant . . . Since the requests of the parties in this case are identical, the Panel has no scope to do anything other than to recognize the common request, and it has no mandate to make findings of fact or of compliance (or not) with the Policy.”); see also Disney Enters., Inc. v. Morales, FA 475191 (Nat. Arb. Forum June 24, 2005) (“[U]nder such circumstances, where Respondent has agreed to comply with Complainant’s request, the Panel felt it to be expedient and judicial to forego the traditional UDRP analysis and order the transfer of the domain names.”). DECISION For the foregoing reasons, the Panel concludes that relief requested by both parties shall be GRANTED. Accordingly, it is Ordered that the <kellyserivces.com> domain name be TRANSFERRED from Respondent to Complainant. Luiz Edgard Montaury Pimenta, Panelist Dated: August 22, 2008 Click Here to return to the main Domain Decisions Page. Click Here to return to our Home Page

Source of record: FORUM . Reproduced for research; FORUM is the authoritative source.

Beyond the decision

What Westmore sees around kellyserivces.com

The decision is only the record. Westmore connects it to the cases, authorities, panelists, parties and domain evidence surrounding it.

Connected to Westmore UDRP Intelligence
115,979 decisions · citations · panelists · parties · domain history
Eleanor · UDRP intelligence
Ask Eleanor about this decision
Ask Eleanor about this decision

A short, grounded explanation drawn only from this decision's record — not legal advice or a prediction.

Unlocking Eleanor for this case uses 1 of your complimentary Intelligence unlocks· 3 remaining

Grounded in the Westmore record for this decision. Research/informational only — not legal advice or a prediction of any outcome.

Westmore Professional · Unlock the intelligence

The decision is only the beginning.

You've seen what happened. Now discover the deeper intelligence behind the case, the panelist, the parties and the authorities that matter.

Citation Intelligence
How this decision is cited and treated across the corpus.
Panelist Intelligence
The panel's tendencies, outcomes and reasoning patterns.
Domain History
Ownership chronology — creation vs. respondent acquisition.
Opposing-Party Research
Complainant, counsel and portfolio context.
Independent Case Review
Eleanor challenges your filing before the other side does.
Professional Matters
Open, research and manage matters end to end.
$395/month
Unlock Westmore Professional Annual & firm seats available · cancel anytime
Take the next step
Westmore UDRP · find the right service

Westmore UDRP records draw on FORUM-indexed decisions and are provided for research and informational purposes only. Not legal advice, a clearance opinion, or a prediction of any outcome.

Essential cookies only. Nothing is sold or shared.