Westmore · UDRP decision
FORUM · Case No. FA1001001301903

Frederics.com

TransferFORUM-indexed · informational, not legal advice

The Panel ordered transfer of <frederics.com> based on Respondent’s consent, foregoing the traditional three-element UDRP analysis. It declined to address the parties’ criticisms of each other as beyond the proceeding’s scope.

Outcome
Transfer
At a glance
Provider
FORUM
Outcome
Transfer
Decision date
2010-02-19
Panelist(s)
The Honorable Charles K. McCotter, Jr. (Ret.)
Complainant
Fredericks of Hollywood Group, Inc.
Respondent
Domain Administration c/o Strong Incorporated
Disputed domain(s)
frederics.com
Citation weightrelies on 2 authorities
Domain history UDRP Intelligence

The timeline behind frederics.com

Registration, the decision and the archived record of what this domain actually displayed — from public RDAP and the Internet Archive.

Westmore reconstructs the full history behind frederics.com — from public RDAP and the Internet Archive — as part of UDRP Intelligence:

Registration → decision → today timeline
Archived Wayback evidence of what the site showed
Registry bad-faith signals
The live current registrant
Available in UDRP Intelligence
Verified public record
Outcome & remedy
Complaint granted. Panel ordered transfer of frederics.com.
Reverse Domain Name Hijacking
No RDNH raised.
Westmore Insight

The Panel made no finding on bad-faith registration or use because Respondent consented to transfer and the Panel elected to forego the traditional UDRP analysis.

The three-part test
Identical or confusingly similarnot_reached
Rights or legitimate interestsnot_reached
Registered and used in bad faithnot_reached

Result of record. The panel's reasoning and decisive facts behind each element are in the Intelligence dossier below.

Related decisions
Case details
Provider
FORUM
Outcome
Transfer
Decision date
2010-02-19
Panel
The Honorable Charles K. McCotter, Jr. (Ret.)
Full decision
3 min read · hosted by Westmore

NATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM DECISION Fredericks of Hollywood Group, Inc. v. Domain Administration c/o Strong Incorporated Claim Number: FA1001001301903 PARTIES Complainant is Fredericks of Hollywood Group, Inc. (“Complainant”), represented by CitizenHawk, Inc., California, USA. Respondent is Domain Administration c/o Strong Incorporated (“Respondent”), Illinois, USA. REGISTRAR AND DISPUTED DOMAIN NAME The domain name at issue is <frederics.com>, registered with Moniker. PANEL The undersigned certifies that he has acted independently and impartially and, to the best of his knowledge, has no known conflict in serving as Panelist in this proceeding. The Honorable Charles K. McCotter, Jr. (Ret.) as Panelist. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Complainant submitted a Complaint to the National Arbitration Forum electronically on January 6, 2010; the National Arbitration Forum received a hard copy of the Complaint on January 7, 2010. On January 9, 2010, Moniker confirmed by e-mail to the National Arbitration Forum that the <frederics.com> domain name is registered with Moniker and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name. Moniker has verified that Respondent is bound by the Moniker registration agreement and has thereby agreed to resolve domain-name disputes brought by third parties in accordance with ICANN's Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy"). On January 12, 2010, a Notification of Complaint and Commencement of Administrative Proceeding (the "Commencement Notification"), setting a deadline of February 1, 2010 by which Respondent could file a response to the Complaint, was transmitted to Respondent via e-mail, post and fax, to all entities and persons listed on Respondent's registration as technical, administrative and billing contacts, and to postmaster@frederics.com by e-mail. Respondent filed a timely Response consenting to the transfer of the disputed domain name. On February 8, 2010, pursuant to Complainant's request to have the dispute decided by a single-member Panel, the National Arbitration Forum appointed the Honorable Charles K. McCotter, Jr. (Ret.) as Panelist. Having reviewed the communications records, the Administrative Panel (the "Panel") finds that the National Arbitration Forum has discharged its responsibility under Paragraph 2(a) of the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules") "to employ reasonably available means calculated to achieve actual notice to Respondent." Therefore, the Panel may issue its decision based on the documents submitted and in accordance with the ICANN Policy, ICANN Rules, the National Arbitration Forum's Supplemental Rules and any rules and principles of law that the Panel deems applicable. RELIEF SOUGHT Complainant requests that the domain name be transferred from Respondent to Complainant. PARTIES' CONTENTIONS A. Complainant makes the following assertions: 1. Respondent’s <frederics.com> domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant’s FREDERICKS.COM mark. 2. Respondent does not have any rights or legitimate interests in the <frederics.com> domain name. 3. Respondent registered and used the <frederics.com> domain name in bad faith. B. Respondent consents to the transfer of the disputed domain name. However, in the Response, Respondent is critical of and challenges the handling of this matter by Complainant’s representative, Citizen Hawk. C. Complainant has submitted a timely additional submission critical of Respondent, addressing Respondent’s challenges and requesting the full traditional analysis. DISCUSSION Since Respondent consents to transfer the <frederics.com> domain name to Complainant, the Panel, in its discretion, will forego the traditional UDRP analysis and order an immediate transfer of the <frederics.com> domain name. See Boehringer Ingelheim Int’l GmbH v. Modern Ltd. – Cayman Web Dev., FA 133625 (Nat. Arb. Forum Jan. 9, 2003) (transferring the domain name registration where the respondent stipulated to the transfer); see also Disney Enters., Inc. v. Morales, FA 475191 (Nat. Arb. Forum June 24, 2005) (“[U]nder such circumstances, where Respondent has agreed to comply with Complainant’s request, the Panel felt it to be expedient and judicial to forego the traditional UDRP analysis and order the transfer of the domain names.”). As the parties’ criticisms of each other are beyond the scope of an ICCAN proceeding, the Panel declines to address these issues. DECISION Accordingly, it is Ordered that the <frederics.com> domain name be TRANSFERRED from Respondent to Complainant. The Honorable Charles K. McCotter, Jr. (Ret.), Panelist Dated: February 19, 2010 Click Here to return to the main Domain Decisions Page. Click Here to return to our Home Page NATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM

Source of record: FORUM . Reproduced for research; FORUM is the authoritative source.

Beyond the decision

What Westmore sees around frederics.com

The decision is only the record. Westmore connects it to the cases, authorities, panelists, parties and domain evidence surrounding it.

Connected to Westmore UDRP Intelligence
116,099 decisions · citations · panelists · parties · domain history
Eleanor · UDRP intelligence
Ask Eleanor about this decision
Ask Eleanor about this decision

A short, grounded explanation drawn only from this decision's record — not legal advice or a prediction.

Unlocking Eleanor for this case uses 1 of your complimentary Intelligence unlocks· 3 remaining

Grounded in the Westmore record for this decision. Research/informational only — not legal advice or a prediction of any outcome.

Westmore Professional · Unlock the intelligence

The decision is only the beginning.

You've seen what happened. Now discover the deeper intelligence behind the case, the panelist, the parties and the authorities that matter.

Citation Intelligence
How this decision is cited and treated across the corpus.
Panelist Intelligence
The panel's tendencies, outcomes and reasoning patterns.
Domain History
Ownership chronology — creation vs. respondent acquisition.
Opposing-Party Research
Complainant, counsel and portfolio context.
Independent Case Review
Eleanor challenges your filing before the other side does.
Professional Matters
Open, research and manage matters end to end.
$395/month
Unlock Westmore Professional Annual & firm seats available · cancel anytime
Take the next step
Westmore UDRP · find the right service

Westmore UDRP records draw on FORUM-indexed decisions and are provided for research and informational purposes only. Not legal advice, a clearance opinion, or a prediction of any outcome.

Confidential buyer-side representation for premium-domain acquisitions, backed by WHOIS, UDRP and domain-sales intelligence.

or
Buyer-side only Escrow-protected NDA on request
Services
Research
UDRP
Widgets
Westmore
Support
Know everything about a domain
Owner, history, status and risk in one search

Copyright © 2026 Westmore. All rights reserved.

Start a confidential acquisition →

Essential cookies only. Nothing is sold or shared.