Westmore · UDRP DecisionJul2pod.com
The Panel ordered transfer of <jul2pod.com> based on Respondent's express consent, without conducting the traditional three-element Policy analysis.
The timeline behind jul2pod.com
Registration, the decision and the archived record of what this domain actually displayed — from public RDAP and the Internet Archive.
Westmore reconstructs the full history behind jul2pod.com — from public RDAP and the Internet Archive — as part of UDRP Intelligence:
The Panel made no finding on bad-faith registration or use because it ordered transfer based on consent.
Result of record. The panel's reasoning and decisive facts behind each element are in the Intelligence dossier below.
NATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM DECISION JUUL Labs, Inc. v. Yusuf USLU / ADS Manager Claim Number: FA2501002137374 PARTIES Complainant is JUUL Labs, Inc. ("Complainant"), represented by Hillary Schroeder of JUUL Labs, Inc., District of Columbia, USA. Respondent is Yusuf USLU / ADS Manager ("Respondent"), Turkey. REGISTRAR AND DISPUTED DOMAIN NAME The domain name at issue is <jul2pod.com>, registered with Name.com, Inc. PANEL The undersigned certifies that he has acted independently and impartially and to the best of his knowledge has no known conflict in serving as Panelist in this proceeding. Alan L. Limbury, as Panelist. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Complainant submitted a Complaint to Forum electronically on January 28, 2025. Forum received payment on January 28, 2025. On January 29, 2025, Name.com, Inc. confirmed by e-mail to Forum that the <jul2pod.com> domain name is registered with Name.com, Inc. and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name. Name.com, Inc. has verified that Respondent is bound by the Name.com, Inc. registration agreement and has thereby agreed to resolve domain disputes brought by third parties in accordance with ICANN's Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy"). On February 3, 2025, Forum served the Complaint and all Annexes, including a Written Notice of the Complaint, setting a deadline of February 24, 2025 by which Respondent could file a Response to the Complaint, via e-mail to all entities and persons listed on Respondent's registration as technical, administrative, and billing contacts, and to postmaster@jul2pod.com. Also on February 3, 2025, the Written Notice of the Complaint, notifying Respondent of the e-mail addresses served and the deadline for a Response, was transmitted to Respondent via post and fax, to all entities and persons listed on Respondent's registration as technical, administrative and billing contacts. On February 17, 2025, Respondent emailed Complainant informally. Complainant forwarded Respondent's email to Forum on February 18, 2025. Having received no formal response from Respondent, Forum transmitted to the parties a Notification of Respondent Default. On February 25, 2025, pursuant to Complainant's request to have the dispute decided by a single-member Panel, Forum appointed Alan L. Limbury as Panelist. Having reviewed the communications records, the Administrative Panel (the "Panel") finds that Forum has discharged its responsibility under Paragraph 2(a) of the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules") "to employ reasonably available means calculated to achieve actual notice to Respondent" through submission of Electronic and Written Notices, as defined in Rule 1 and Rule 2. Therefore, the Panel may issue its decision based on the documents submitted and in accordance with the ICANN Policy, ICANN Rules, Forum's Supplemental Rules and any rules and principles of law that the Panel deems applicable, without the benefit of any formal response from Respondent. RELIEF SOUGHT Complainant requests that the domain name be transferred from Respondent to Complainant. PRELIMINARY ISSUE: CONSENT TO TRANSFER Respondent's informal email addressed to Complainant included inter alia the following statements: "I am writing to confirm that I have authorized the transfer of the domain name jul2pod.com to JUUL Labs, Inc., as per the notification I received regarding the dispute under the ICANN UDRP Policy. To formalize this process, I have already contacted my domain registrar, [Name.com], and requested the removal of the domain from my account and its transfer to your company. I do not intend to raise any objections or contest the transfer." The Panel notes that since the Registrar had already placed the domain name on Registrar Lock, it was not possible for Respondent to arrange its release. In light of Respondent's consent to the transfer to Complainant of the <jul2pod.com> domain name, the Panel considers it appropriate to order the transfer without embarking on the traditional Policy analysis. See Disney Enters., Inc. v. Morales, FA 475191 (Forum June 24, 2005) ("[U]nder such circumstances, where Respondent has agreed to comply with Complainant's request, the Panel felt it to be expedient and judicial to forego the traditional UDRP analysis and order the transfer of the domain names."). DECISION Respondent having consented to the transfer of the domain name to Complainant, the Panel concludes that relief shall be GRANTED. Accordingly, it is Ordered that the <jul2pod.com> domain name be TRANSFERRED from Respondent to Complainant. Alan L. Limbury, Panelist Dated: February 26, 2025 Click Here to return to the main Domain Decisions Page. Click Here to return to our Home Page
Source of record: FORUM . Reproduced for research; FORUM is the authoritative source.
What Westmore sees around jul2pod.com
The decision is only the record. Westmore connects it to the cases, authorities, panelists, parties and domain evidence surrounding it.

A short, grounded explanation drawn only from this decision's record — not legal advice or a prediction.
Grounded in the Westmore record for this decision. Research/informational only — not legal advice or a prediction of any outcome.
The decision is only the beginning.
You've seen what happened. Now discover the deeper intelligence behind the case, the panelist, the parties and the authorities that matter.
Go beyond the public record: see how this case has been cited, find comparable decisions, analyze the panelist and apply the relevant authorities to your Matter.
Westmore Professional · $395/month
Research with UDRP IntelligenceWestmore AI drafts an attorney-review-ready UDRP response from your facts, grounded in the exact panel and closest precedent.
$895 one-time per matter · no subscription required. Self-help drafting aid — not legal advice.
Build your responseWestmore UDRP records draw on FORUM-indexed decisions and are provided for research and informational purposes only. Not legal advice, a clearance opinion, or a prediction of any outcome.