Westmore · UDRP decision
FORUM · Case No. FA2502002142330

Onbond.org

TransferFORUM-indexed · informational, not legal advice

The Panel construed Respondent’s Response as consent to transfer <onbond.org> and ordered transfer without conducting the traditional three-element UDRP analysis.

Outcome
Transfer
At a glance
Provider
FORUM
Outcome
Transfer
Decision date
2025-03-15
Panelist(s)
Alan L. Limbury
Complainant
Unbound
Respondent
ogechukwu agidi / Mercury Century, LLC
Counsel
Cynthia Johnson Walden
Law firm
Fish & Richardson P.C.
Disputed domain(s)
onbond.org
Citation weightrelies on 1 authority
Domain history UDRP Intelligence

The timeline behind onbond.org

Registration, the decision and the archived record of what this domain actually displayed — from public RDAP and the Internet Archive.

Westmore reconstructs the full history behind onbond.org — from public RDAP and the Internet Archive — as part of UDRP Intelligence:

Registration → decision → today timeline
Archived Wayback evidence of what the site showed
Registry bad-faith signals
The live current registrant
Available in UDRP Intelligence
Verified public record
Outcome & remedy
Complaint granted. Panel ordered transfer of onbond.org.
Reverse Domain Name Hijacking
No RDNH raised.
Westmore Insight

The Panel did not decide registration or use in bad faith because it ordered transfer based on consent.

The three-part test
Identical or confusingly similarnot_reached
Rights or legitimate interestsnot_reached
Registered and used in bad faithnot_reached

Result of record. The panel's reasoning and decisive facts behind each element are in the Intelligence dossier below.

Related decisions
Case details
Provider
FORUM
Outcome
Transfer
Decision date
2025-03-15
Panel
Alan L. Limbury
Full decision
3 min read · hosted by Westmore

NATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM DECISION Unbound v. ogechukwu agidi / Mercury Century, LLC Claim Number: FA2502002142330 PARTIES Complainant is Unbound ("Complainant"), represented by Cynthia Johnson Walden of Fish & Richardson P.C., Massachusetts, USA. Respondent is ogechukwu agidi / Mercury Century, LLC ("Respondent"), California, USA. REGISTRAR AND DISPUTED DOMAIN NAME The domain name at issue is <onbond.org>, registered with Wild West Domains, LLC. PANEL The undersigned certifies that he has acted independently and impartially and to the best of his knowledge has no known conflict in serving as Panelist in this proceeding. Alan L. Limbury, as Panelist. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Complainant submitted a Complaint to Forum electronically on February 26, 2025. Forum received payment on February 26, 2025. On February 27, 2025, Wild West Domains, LLC confirmed by e-mail to Forum that the <onbond.org> domain name is registered with Wild West Domains, LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name. Wild West Domains, LLC has verified that Respondent is bound by the Wild West Domains, LLC registration agreement and has thereby agreed to resolve domain disputes brought by third parties in accordance with ICANN's Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy"). On March 4, 2025, Forum served the Complaint and all Annexes, including a Written Notice of the Complaint, setting a deadline of March 24, 2025 by which Respondent could file a Response to the Complaint, via e-mail to all entities and persons listed on Respondent's registration as technical, administrative, and billing contacts, and to postmaster@onbond.org. Also on March 4, 2025, the Written Notice of the Complaint, notifying Respondent of the e-mail addresses served and the deadline for a Response, was transmitted to Respondent via post and fax, to all entities and persons listed on Respondent's registration as technical, administrative and billing contacts. A timely Response was received and determined to be complete on March 14, 2025. On March 14, 2025, pursuant to Complainant's request to have the dispute decided by a single-member Panel, Forum appointed Alan L. Limbury as Panelist. RELIEF SOUGHT Complainant requests that the domain name be transferred from Respondent to Complainant. PARTIES' CONTENTIONS A. Complainant Complainant, Unbound, is an international nonprofit headquartered in Kansas City, Kansas. Respondent's <onbond.org> domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant's UNBOUND mark, in which Complainant has common-law and statutory rights. Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the domain name, which was registered and is being used in bad faith. The content of the website to which the domain name resolves has been copied directly from Complainant's website, such that Respondent is attempting to misrepresent itself as Complainant. B. Respondent Respondent registered and used the domain name for tutorial purposes last year with purely educational intent, with no commercial use or bad faith intentions. After receiving notice of the Complaint, Respondent deleted the website and is open to resolving this case amicably. FINDINGS The Panel takes the Response to amount to Respondent's consent to the transfer to Complainant of the <onbond.org> domain name. Accordingly, the Panel considers it appropriate to order the transfer without embarking on the traditional Policy analysis. See Disney Enters., Inc. v. Morales, FA 475191 (Forum June 24, 2005) ("[U]nder such circumstances, where Respondent has agreed to comply with Complainant's request, the Panel felt it to be expedient and judicial to forego the traditional UDRP analysis and order the transfer of the domain names."). DECISION Respondent having consented to the transfer of the domain name to Complainant, the Panel concludes that relief shall be GRANTED. Accordingly, it is Ordered that the <onbond.org> domain name be TRANSFERRED from Respondent to Complainant. Alan L. Limbury, Panelist Dated: March 15, 2025 Click Here to return to the main Domain Decisions Page. Click Here to return to our Home Page

Source of record: FORUM . Reproduced for research; FORUM is the authoritative source.

Beyond the decision

What Westmore sees around onbond.org

The decision is only the record. Westmore connects it to the cases, authorities, panelists, parties and domain evidence surrounding it.

Connected to Westmore UDRP Intelligence
115,979 decisions · citations · panelists · parties · domain history
Eleanor · UDRP intelligence
Ask Eleanor about this decision
Ask Eleanor about this decision

A short, grounded explanation drawn only from this decision's record — not legal advice or a prediction.

Unlocking Eleanor for this case uses 1 of your complimentary Intelligence unlocks· 3 remaining

Grounded in the Westmore record for this decision. Research/informational only — not legal advice or a prediction of any outcome.

Westmore Professional · Unlock the intelligence

The decision is only the beginning.

You've seen what happened. Now discover the deeper intelligence behind the case, the panelist, the parties and the authorities that matter.

Citation Intelligence
How this decision is cited and treated across the corpus.
Panelist Intelligence
The panel's tendencies, outcomes and reasoning patterns.
Domain History
Ownership chronology — creation vs. respondent acquisition.
Opposing-Party Research
Complainant, counsel and portfolio context.
Independent Case Review
Eleanor challenges your filing before the other side does.
Professional Matters
Open, research and manage matters end to end.
$395/month
Unlock Westmore Professional Annual & firm seats available · cancel anytime
Take the next step
Westmore UDRP · find the right service

Westmore UDRP records draw on FORUM-indexed decisions and are provided for research and informational purposes only. Not legal advice, a clearance opinion, or a prediction of any outcome.

Essential cookies only. Nothing is sold or shared.