Westmore · UDRP DecisionCardkingdom.shop
The Panel ordered transfer of <cardkingdom.shop> based on Respondent’s express consent, without conducting the traditional three-element Policy analysis.
The timeline behind cardkingdom.shop
Registration, the decision and the archived record of what this domain actually displayed — from public RDAP and the Internet Archive.
Westmore reconstructs the full history behind cardkingdom.shop — from public RDAP and the Internet Archive — as part of UDRP Intelligence:
The Panel did not decide registration or use in bad faith because it ordered transfer based on Respondent’s consent.
Result of record. The panel's reasoning and decisive facts behind each element are in the Intelligence dossier below.
NATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM DECISION Card Kingdom, Inc. v. TSUBASA SUGAWARA / wing Claim Number: FA2602002203576 PARTIES Complainant is Card Kingdom, Inc. ("Complainant"), represented by Winfield B. Martin of Perkins Coie LLP, Washington, USA. Respondent is TSUBASA SUGAWARA / wing ("Respondent"), Japan. REGISTRAR AND DISPUTED DOMAIN NAME The domain name at issue is <cardkingdom.shop>, registered with Tucows Domains Inc. PANEL The undersigned certifies that he has acted independently and impartially and to the best of his knowledge has no known conflict in serving as Panelist in this proceeding. Alan L. Limbury, as Panelist. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Complainant submitted a Complaint to Forum electronically on February 4, 2026. Forum received payment on February 4, 2026. On February 5, 2026, Tucows Domains Inc. confirmed by e-mail to Forum that the <cardkingdom.shop> domain name is registered with Tucows Domains Inc. and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name. Tucows Domains Inc. has verified that Respondent is bound by the Tucows Domains Inc. registration agreement and has thereby agreed to resolve domain disputes brought by third parties in accordance with ICANN's Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy"). On February 5, 2026, Forum served the Complaint and all Annexes, including a Written Notice of the Complaint, setting a deadline of February 25, 2026 by which Respondent could file a Response to the Complaint, via e-mail to all entities and persons listed on Respondent's registration as technical, administrative, and billing contacts, and to postmaster@cardkingdom.shop. Also on February 5, 2026, the Written Notice of the Complaint, notifying Respondent of the e-mail addresses served and the deadline for a Response, was transmitted to Respondent via post and fax, to all entities and persons listed on Respondent's registration as technical, administrative and billing contacts. Having received no formal response from Respondent, Forum transmitted to the parties a Notification of Respondent Default. On February 26, 2026, pursuant to Complainant's request to have the dispute decided by a single-member Panel, Forum appointed Alan L. Limbury as Panelist. RELIEF SOUGHT Complainant requests that the domain name be transferred from Respondent to Complainant. PRELIMINARY ISSUE: CONSENT TO TRANSFER On February 20, 2026, Respondent emailed Forum as follows: "The domain has not been actively used, and I have no intention of using it in the future. I do not wish to contest this proceeding. Accordingly, I am willing to voluntarily transfer the domain name to the Complainant." Under these circumstances the Panel considers it appropriate to order the transfer of the <cardkingdom.shop> domain name without embarking on the traditional Policy analysis. See Disney Enters., Inc. v. Morales, FA 475191 (Forum June 24, 2005). DECISION Respondent having consented to the transfer of the domain name to Complainant, the Panel concludes that relief shall be GRANTED. Accordingly, it is Ordered that the <cardkingdom.shop> domain name be TRANSFERRED from Respondent to Complainant. Alan L. Limbury, Panelist Dated: March 5, 2026 Click Here to return to the main Domain Decisions Page. Click Here to return to our Home Page
Source of record: FORUM . Reproduced for research; FORUM is the authoritative source.
What Westmore sees around cardkingdom.shop
The decision is only the record. Westmore connects it to the cases, authorities, panelists, parties and domain evidence surrounding it.

A short, grounded explanation drawn only from this decision's record — not legal advice or a prediction.
Grounded in the Westmore record for this decision. Research/informational only — not legal advice or a prediction of any outcome.
The decision is only the beginning.
You've seen what happened. Now discover the deeper intelligence behind the case, the panelist, the parties and the authorities that matter.
Go beyond the public record: see how this case has been cited, find comparable decisions, analyze the panelist and apply the relevant authorities to your Matter.
Westmore Professional · $395/month
Research with UDRP IntelligenceWestmore AI drafts an attorney-review-ready UDRP response from your facts, grounded in the exact panel and closest precedent.
$895 one-time per matter · no subscription required. Self-help drafting aid — not legal advice.
Build your responseWestmore UDRP records draw on FORUM-indexed decisions and are provided for research and informational purposes only. Not legal advice, a clearance opinion, or a prediction of any outcome.