Westmore · UDRP decision
FORUM · Case No. FA2602002204877

Coverking.online

TransferFORUM-indexed · informational, not legal advice

The Panel ordered transfer of <coverking.online> based on Respondent's express consent, without conducting the traditional analysis under the three UDRP elements.

Outcome
Transfer
At a glance
Provider
FORUM
Outcome
Transfer
Decision date
2026-03-06
Panelist(s)
Alan L. Limbury
Complainant
Shrin LLC
Respondent
Sarwar Jahan Nadim
Counsel
Adriano Pacifici
Law firm
Intellectual Property Consulting, LLC
Disputed domain(s)
coverking.online
Citation weightrelies on 1 authority
Domain history UDRP Intelligence

The timeline behind coverking.online

Registration, the decision and the archived record of what this domain actually displayed — from public RDAP and the Internet Archive.

Westmore reconstructs the full history behind coverking.online — from public RDAP and the Internet Archive — as part of UDRP Intelligence:

Registration → decision → today timeline
Archived Wayback evidence of what the site showed
Registry bad-faith signals
The live current registrant
Available in UDRP Intelligence
Verified public record
Outcome & remedy
Complaint granted. Panel ordered transfer of coverking.online.
Reverse Domain Name Hijacking
No RDNH raised.
Westmore Insight

The Panel did not decide registration and use in bad faith because Respondent consented to transfer and the Panel declined to undertake the traditional Policy analysis.

The three-part test
Identical or confusingly similarnot_reached
Rights or legitimate interestsnot_reached
Registered and used in bad faithnot_reached

Result of record. The panel's reasoning and decisive facts behind each element are in the Intelligence dossier below.

Related decisions
Case details
Provider
FORUM
Outcome
Transfer
Decision date
2026-03-06
Panel
Alan L. Limbury
Full decision
3 min read · hosted by Westmore

NATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM DECISION Shrin LLC v. Sarwar Jahan Nadim Claim Number: FA2602002204877 PARTIES Complainant is Shrin LLC ("Complainant"), represented by Adriano Pacifici of Intellectual Property Consulting, LLC, Louisiana, USA. Respondent is Sarwar Jahan Nadim ("Respondent"), Bangladesh. REGISTRAR AND DISPUTED DOMAIN NAME The domain name at issue is <coverking.online>, registered with NameCheap, Inc. PANEL The undersigned certifies that he has acted independently and impartially and to the best of his knowledge has no known conflict in serving as Panelist in this proceeding. Alan L. Limbury, as Panelist. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Complainant submitted a Complaint to Forum electronically on February 11, 2026. Forum received payment on February 11, 2026. On February 12, 2026, NameCheap, Inc. confirmed by e-mail to Forum that the <coverking.online> domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name. NameCheap, Inc. has verified that Respondent is bound by the NameCheap, Inc. registration agreement and has thereby agreed to resolve domain disputes brought by third parties in accordance with ICANN's Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy"). On February 12, 2026, Forum served the Complaint and all Annexes, including a Written Notice of the Complaint, setting a deadline of March 4, 2026 by which Respondent could file a Response to the Complaint, via e-mail to all entities and persons listed on Respondent's registration as technical, administrative, and billing contacts, and to postmaster@coverking.online. Also on February 12, 2026, the Written Notice of the Complaint, notifying Respondent of the e-mail addresses served and the deadline for a Response, was transmitted to Respondent via post and fax, to all entities and persons listed on Respondent's registration as technical, administrative and billing contacts. On February 13, 2026, Respondent informally communicated by e-mail to Forum. Having received no formal response from Respondent, Forum transmitted to the parties a Notification of Respondent Default. On March 5, 2026, pursuant to Complainant's request to have the dispute decided by a single-member Panel, Forum appointed Alan L. Limbury as Panelist. RELIEF SOUGHT Complainant requests that the domain name be transferred from Respondent to Complainant. PRELIMINARY ISSUE: CONSENT TO TRANSFER Respondent's informal e-mail to Forum stated: "The domain name was registered based on a business name idea generated through ChatGPT. At the time of registration, I was not aware of the Complainant's trademark or any related brand rights. To resolve this matter amicably and without further proceedings, I hereby consent to the transfer of the disputed domain name to the Complainant." Under these circumstances the Panel considers it appropriate to order the transfer of the <coverking.online> domain name without embarking on the traditional Policy analysis. See Disney Enters., Inc. v. Morales, FA 475191 (Forum June 24, 2005). DECISION Respondent having consented to the transfer of the domain name to Complainant, the Panel concludes that relief shall be GRANTED. Accordingly, it is Ordered that the <coverking.online> domain name be TRANSFERRED from Respondent to Complainant. Alan L. Limbury, Panelist Dated: March 6, 2026 Click Here to return to the main Domain Decisions Page. Click Here to return to our Home Page

Source of record: FORUM . Reproduced for research; FORUM is the authoritative source.

Beyond the decision

What Westmore sees around coverking.online

The decision is only the record. Westmore connects it to the cases, authorities, panelists, parties and domain evidence surrounding it.

Connected to Westmore UDRP Intelligence
115,934 decisions · citations · panelists · parties · domain history
Eleanor · UDRP intelligence
Ask Eleanor about this decision
Ask Eleanor about this decision

A short, grounded explanation drawn only from this decision's record — not legal advice or a prediction.

Unlocking Eleanor for this case uses 1 of your complimentary Intelligence unlocks· 3 remaining

Grounded in the Westmore record for this decision. Research/informational only — not legal advice or a prediction of any outcome.

Westmore Professional · Unlock the intelligence

The decision is only the beginning.

You've seen what happened. Now discover the deeper intelligence behind the case, the panelist, the parties and the authorities that matter.

Citation Intelligence
How this decision is cited and treated across the corpus.
Panelist Intelligence
The panel's tendencies, outcomes and reasoning patterns.
Domain History
Ownership chronology — creation vs. respondent acquisition.
Opposing-Party Research
Complainant, counsel and portfolio context.
Independent Case Review
Eleanor challenges your filing before the other side does.
Professional Matters
Open, research and manage matters end to end.
$395/month
Unlock Westmore Professional Annual & firm seats available · cancel anytime
Take the next step
Westmore UDRP · find the right service

Westmore UDRP records draw on FORUM-indexed decisions and are provided for research and informational purposes only. Not legal advice, a clearance opinion, or a prediction of any outcome.

Confidential buyer-side representation for premium-domain acquisitions.

LinkedIn
Insights
Briefs
Who Owns
Westmore
Research
Services
UDRP
Support
Buyer-side only· Escrow-protected· NDA on request

© 2026 Westmore. All rights reserved.

A note on privacy

Westmore uses a few essential cookies to keep this site secure and running smoothly. Nothing about your identity or interest is ever sold or shared.